User talk:Jebbles

July 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 22:33, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'm reasonably confident Eswong and Jebbles are different people; both have communicated with me offwiki and appear authentically different. Is this block based entirely on behavioural evidence? Vaticidalprophet 22:41, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Based on what they've been doing, I figured they were either sock puppets or meat puppets. Either way, it's a violation of policy. They're clearly collaborating, not just on en.wiki but even on Commons. In addition, Jebbles (or the Jebbles account) does not act like a new user. Why would they both communicate with you offwiki?--Bbb23 (talk) 22:49, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * What policy are they violating? I'm fairly certain "collaborating" is not against policy; you seem to be suggesting that some policy is violated even assuming they are different people? User:力 (power~enwiki,  π,  ν ) 22:54, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * They both joined Discord and sought mentorship, which I offered because I'm reasonably experienced with medical editing. Jebbles appeared fairly authentically new-editor when I first interacted with her; inasmuch as she "doesn't" now I assume it's because she's talking with someone who has a fair amount of sense of how to edit in her spheres of interest, which is what we want new editors to do. My thoughts on the applicability of "meatpuppetry" here are as Power's; it does not strike me as applicable to "people who collaborate in their shared area of interest without disruption". Vaticidalprophet 22:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I just want to add onto my unblock request in response to the "In addition, Jebbles (or the Jebbles account) does not act like a new user." First, as Vaticidalprophet stated, he and the others on the Discord has helped me temendously learning the ropes as a new editor. You can definitely check the logs in the discord we are in for an abundance of random questions that I have asked. I spent my sleepless insomniac nights these last few days reading pretty much every Wiki essay on what to do and what not to do (even WP:BEANS). To build up from this, I have lots of experience as a graduate from a bachelor degree program in writing objective essays and literature reviews. I also have experience in writing a research thesis for my capstone project. The skills I learned from my education has been transferable to helping to improve Wikipedia. I believe that the accusation of me and TheRibinator as meatpuppets is not founded on grounds that supports the definition of meatpuppetry described in WP:MEAT. It mentions there is a high-profile dispute, or any dispute in which one person will ask another offwiki to "back them up". We don't have any disputes, nor causes to promote. We did not recruit each other to influence any decision on Wikipedia. I have not participated in anything that would be considered as such as far as I am aware of. We simply both have the same interest in improving articles that have needed the attention. We are open to answering any questions or concerns that you may have. Thanks, Jebbles (talk) 23:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC)


 * , is there any evidence of disruption or deception in how these two users are working together? GeneralNotability (talk) 23:32, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I suspect I have a broader view of what constitutes disruption or deception. I am not convinced by Jebbels's arguments. That said, if you wish to unblock the two users, that's fine.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:17, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

White-breasted nuthatch
Hi. Just had to do a bit of a fix on White-breasted nuthatch. Please take a look and make sure you are happy. YorkshireExpat (talk) 15:49, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , thank you so much! I'm so sorry I messed up the references, I uploaded 8 at the same time back to back and wasn't paying attention. It looks absolutely phenomenal. :) Jebbles (talk) 16:33, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Alert
&#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 18:46, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Rib head syndrome moved to draftspace
Thanks for creating Rib head syndrome. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:27, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rib head syndrome
Hello, Jebbles. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rib head syndrome, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rib head syndrome


Hello, Jebbles. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rib head syndrome".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:27, 19 June 2023 (UTC)