User talk:Jebradwell

Welcome to Wikipedia
Hi, I'm Oiyarbepsy and I can see fairies.

Welcome and thank you for joining and editing Wikipedia. Unfortunately, we can't allow you to write articles about yourself or about people or organizations that you work for, per Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy. I would suggest that you instead work on other articles in your area of knowledge.

If you have any questions, please click this link, then hit the new section and rock and roll. I really like to pretend to know what I'm doing here, so I'm sure I'll give you the right answer, and if I don't, you can whack me with a trout.

Thanks, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:36, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

By the way, this is not an automated bot that placed this message. Yes, it is boilerplate, but it won't appear anywhere if I don't put it there.

Speedy deletion nomination of Eternal Elucidation Entertainments


A tag has been placed on Eternal Elucidation Entertainments, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:37, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Eternal Elucidation Entertainments has been reverted. Your edit here to Eternal Elucidation Entertainments was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6-X9j_lnmc&list=PLXZGhaZBDcQPRTYjam0FjRKgRwzIIoRld) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ASCII RPG
Hello Jebradwell,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ASCII RPG for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. FindMeLost (talk) 04:56, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eternal Elucidation


A tag has been placed on Eternal Elucidation, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
 * It appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted, or is eligible for deletion itself. (See section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:04, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeb Bradwell
Hello Jebradwell,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jeb Bradwell for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. FindMeLost (talk) 06:05, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Warning
Hello Jeb Bradwell. The nature of your edits makes it obvious you have a financial stake in promoting yourself, your company and your products. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . Please provide the required disclosure and do not edit further until you answer this message. I will block you if you continue to edit without declaring a COI or if you continue to write promotional articles Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:45, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. I deleted your article Eternal Elucidation Entertainments because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. You gave no references of any kind to support your text.
 * I can't see any indication of why the company is notable. To show notability you need hard facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Articles about companies and their products are always going to be treated as promotional if they aren't supported by third-party sources. That's particularly the case where the creator has an obvious COI

What I've said applies in principle to your other articles. Although I wouldn't necessarily recommend Blizzard Entertainment as a model, you will see that it has looks of mostly decent refs.

I simply don't know whether any of your articles meet our notability criteria, without hard facts backed by independent references, it's impossible to tell. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:22, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Jim,

Thanks for the feedback, I will re-write in a neutral tone and speak about only third party evidential topics with links provided to support the text. Could I also have you check out my post before I submit it to get help if there are parts that need to be fixed?

Thanks for working with me :) Sorry for my mistakes. I hope to do things correctly this time around.

Kind regards,

2601:601:8100:7901:BDBF:863E:3375:D447 (talk) 01:06, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=726918902 your edit] to Lemuria (continent) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:10, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
 * recognized as the duality of this world, in which there exist both soul "...was that which gave the body life... Francis M. Cornford quotes Pindar by saying that the soul

Sources and original research
Your source mentioning Lemuria fails our criteria at WP:RS and your other sources don't discuss Lemuria so are original research, see WP:NOR. Doug Weller talk 18:56, 25 June 2016 (UTC)