User talk:Jeconsult

History of Williamsport, Pennsylvania
Hey, thanks for adding the story of the hotel. Unfortunately, your link did not contain any information to verify what you posted here. Everything you add must be verified by reliable sources so that people can examine the sources for themselves. --15:50, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kellie Madison
Hello Jeconsult,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kellie Madison for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 16:20, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 16:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kellie madison


The article Kellie madison has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication that the subject meets the guidelines for inclusion. Notability is not inherited; no significant third-party coverage or references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. § FreeRangeFrog 20:47, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Conflict of interest notice
Hello, Jeconsult. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * You need not declare your conflict of interest, but we recommend it.
 * Do not edit articles about yourself, your organization, or your competitors. Do not edit related articles. (Exceptions.)
 * Post suggestions and sources on the article's talk page, or create a draft in your user space.
 * Your role is to summarize, inform and reference &mdash; not to promote, sell, or whitewash.
 * If writing a draft, write without bias, as if you don't work for the company or personally know the subject.
 * Have us review your draft.
 * Work with us and we'll work with you.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 16:34, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Stop adding fictional promotional material as if it were true
Hello, I see that all of your article edits (that have not been deleted) are related to inserting promotional material for a movie into articles on Williamsport, Pennsylvania or its history. I further note that your edits present the promotional material, which is fictional, as if it were true. This is against Wikipedia policy (for example, please see WP:V and WP:RS) and so your edits have been reverted. I also note that the repeated attempts to insert promotional material looks as if you you may have a conflict of interest. I am warning you now that if you persist in this kind of editing, you will be blocked from editing. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 16:47, 20 April 2013 (UTC)