User talk:Jedisvrais

February 2017
Hello, I'm Uamaol. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Vladimir Plahotniuc without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Uamaol (talk) 15:27, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Vladimir Plahotniuc, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Before removing content, start discussion on talk page. Please refrain from copy-pasting content from other website and provide references in future. Thanks.'' Uamaol (talk) 15:40, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vladimir Plahotniuc, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. ''Do not remove cited material simply because you feel it does not present a view you like. If you feel the article is unfairly biased, take that up at the talk page.'' WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Vladimir Plahotniuc. ''Once again, discuss your edits. You have not violated the three revert rule and are subject to being blocked for that alone.'' WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:51, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:08, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Vladimir Plahotniuc. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Neil N  talk to me 22:43, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Vladimir Plahotniuc
How are you connected with the subject of the article Vladimir Plahotniuc? Also how can you prove something without giving references? Thanks. Uamaol (talk) 15:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 18:45, 28 March 2017 (UTC)