User talk:Jeeeves

Bold text== Monty Python ==

Agreed. I'll go through each of my edits again to clean up my work, but you should give editors a chance to fix their work before just blatantly reverting everything they've done? I appreciate you pointing out further work to be done on the article. Will you actually let me do the work or will you just undo it again? --In Defense of the Artist (talk) 21:27, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Had you brought Life of Brian to my attention I would have fixed it immediately. Since I was in the process of cleaning up the individual bios in the Python article, I would have easily done so while I was in there.  Once you leave a note on my talk page, I usually get to editing whatever needs to get done.  Next time why not leave a note, and see if the editor does the job before undoing all of his work? --In Defense of the Artist (talk) 22:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Why don't you have good faith in people that the intend to improve the articles they are editing. If you don't have the time to fix an article that is bad, you should alert the editor of the article that made the changes that you object to.  Be part of the community and communicate with other editors with which you are working instead of a hack-and-slash editor.  Having people continually working to improve articles is better than discouraging people from working on them at all. --In Defense of the Artist (talk) 22:27, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I apologize that I'm not as good an editor as you are, and I apologize for making four articles look pretty stupid. Please next time give me a chance to fix my mistakes.  I want to be a really good editor here, and I'm trying really hard.  Next time please point out the mistakes that I made, and I will fix them.  I promise! --In Defense of the Artist (talk) 22:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay, let's start from scratch...I double checked the Palin article, and I find no redundancy between the information I added and the information already in the article. The article was improved by my edits my expanding on the area of his career that he is best known for. What's your beef with it? --In Defense of the Artist (talk) 22:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Heather O'Neill 72dpi 2664.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Heather O'Neill 72dpi 2664.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 17:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Heather O'Neill 72dpi 2664.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Heather O'Neill 72dpi 2664.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. 72.88.56.218 (talk) 21:26, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)