User talk:Jeep1992

July 2022
Hello, I'm General Ization. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sally Yates without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  General Ization Talk  18:25, 20 July 2022 (UTC)


 * I removed the particular content from Sally Yates because she was not a member of the Trump administration. She was acting Attorney General at the very beginning of the Trump administration, but I don't consider acting Attorneys General as being an official Attorney General. Trump did not nominate her to be his Attorney General. There is no logical reason why she should be listed as a member of the Trump cabinet. Please restore my edits. Jeep1992 (talk) 18:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The category is not "United States Attorneys General who served a full term", but "United States Attorneys General". Yates did in fact hold the position of AG, albeit in an acting capacity, for 10 days during the Trump administration, and so was also a member of the Trump administration (the other category you removed) for that period.  There are quite a few AGs named at United States Attorney General who did not fulfill a full term, and several who were acting, including Dana Boente who was also acting AG during the Trump administration.  All this aside, you must use the edit summary to explain edits where you remove content, especially when you appear to be performing a mass removal of content from a large number of articles.  General Ization  Talk  18:52, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * "I don't consider acting Attorneys General as being an official Attorney General" is not a valid argument for this removal, as the inclusion of this category is not based on what you consider. The inclusion of numerous acting AGs at United States Attorney General makes it pretty clear that they belong in the category. Unless you seek and can find consensus for the mass removal on the Talk pages for the categories you are removing, or perhaps at the Talk pages for the related articles, you should stop the mass removals. You certainly should not continue based only on your own interpretation.  General Ization Talk  18:55, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * My point is that she was a temporary holdover until Trump's appointment, Jeff Sessions, could be confirmed by the Senate. She was not confirmed by the Senate to be Attorney General. Jeep1992 (talk) 19:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Confirmed or not, she was doing the job (to the best of her ability) for a time. Unless you can find support for the notion that only confirmed AGs are really AGs, you should leave the category in place. In addition, you were removing other categories from this and other articles where I don't think this fact pattern applies.  General Ization Talk  19:21, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you should propose the addition of new categories for acting federal directors and cabinet officers, if you think that distinction is necessary in our categorization system.  General Ization Talk  19:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Gina Haspel
Please see Talk:Gina Haspel/Archives/2022 on why your edits keep getting reverted. The reason: MOS:SMALLFONT. The infobox is already at a reduced font size and by making it smaller makes it more difficult for those with disabilities. Please refrain from edit-warring any further and discuss on the talk page. Corky 12:42, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)