User talk:Jeff00seattle

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeff Tanner (programmer)


A tag has been placed on Jeff Tanner (programmer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. → Σ σ  ς. 19:02, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of XObjects


The article XObjects has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not enough here to know what the article is about. "XObjects" is an overloaded term, but I'm not seeing any cites to Lingo-specific XObjects.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 00:38, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Lingo 90%/10%
Hi - thanks for all you contributions to the various Director pages. (Do I know you from Hopper-ex or anywhere?) Anyway, I've just been having a flip through them and making sure they stay tidy - getting rid of tags the Wikipedia bots put in and stuff.

in Lingo (programming language), way back in 2014 you wrote:

"Initially, about 90% of the users only used 10% of Lingo's features; primarily by multimedia authors of tutorials and presentations. However, 10% of the users were game developers who took a wider interest in the other 90% of the functionality, including their own functional extensions by creating their own XFactories/XObjects."

They're looking for citations for those numbers, and as you may have experienced, Wikipedia doesn't go for "I am the citation!" as an answer. Maybe we should just change them to something more vague like 'the vast majority' rather than 90% etc? What do you think

--Mark Whybird (talk) 00:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)