User talk:Jeff01020

May 2017
Hello, I'm TheFrog001. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Edmund Barton— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheFrog001 (Talk to me!) 08:29, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Reilly. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Reilly was changed by Jeff01020 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.940249 on 2017-05-30T08:34:22+00:00.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:56, 30 May 2017 (UTC)