User talk:Jeff1938

May 2016
Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Rapastinel— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 13:23, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Edit war warning
You are removing the whole reference section which is vandalism. STOP IT.

Please come to the Talk page and explain what you mean - your edit note makes no sense. So come and explain. Here: Talk:Rapastinel.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Rapastinel. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jytdog (talk) 01:19, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Also, the reference comes straight from PubMed, so if you have an issue with the listed authors for that article, you need to take it up with them, not us. —C.Fred (talk) 02:24, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see the change you were asserting needed made to the authorship. Hopefully the result is what you were after. —C.Fred (talk) 03:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)