User talk:Jeff3000/Archive02

Bahá'í Prophecies
Just now I created this stub. Could you have a look at it, and try to improve it? Wiki-uk 13:23, 14 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Could you have a look again. As you must have noticed, I have difficulty in summarizing/removing quotes to shorten the article... Wiki-uk 14:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I tried to summarize the lengthy section, and put it back in the article. Can you check it? Wiki-uk 16:37, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Joyeux Nowruz
Ayez nouvelle une année heureuse et joyeuse !

69.196.139.250 21:47, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

You are great!
I saw your new proposal for solving the Newroz war. I back you 100% and want to thank you for making the propsal on your user page and for keeping the cool in the heated cross fire! Bertilvidet 09:28, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I agree with your proposal. I also support existence of an article which directly discuss the issue of Kurds and Newroz in detals.  D iyako Talk + 14:38, 21 March 2006 (UTC).  D iyako Talk + 14:37, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

ArbCom Case
Hi, I included a diff to your comments in an ongoing ArbCom case that we unfortunately had to file for Aucaman; so just be aware of that please.Zmmz 23:03, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

HAPPY NEW YEAR
 D iyako Talk + 10:28, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Newroz
Hi Jeff, I've unprotected Newroz as requested. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 20:07, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Canada
Please review User:Maclean25/sandbox. I understand there is an attempt at making the Canada into a featured article. I note that the History section was overly long and that considerable pruning has taken place to get it to a reasonable length. However, I also see that further improvements need to be made in order to make it past WP:FAC. In re-writing the history section in my sandbox I removed the sub-headings (noting that none of the other country FAs use sub-headings in the history section - or any other section as they are generally discouraged for summary style sections), used few transitional (fluff) sentences (though I have been criticized on this at FAC), and used key wikilinking in order to remove detail that would bloat the sentences. The section is currently incomplete as I am missing several themes (Quebec sov, economics). I understand the sandbox version is rough but I would appreciate your thoughts on the style before I bring this to the Canada article talk page. -07:31, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

linking
Nice work on Canada. I'm tempted just to pull out all of the lionks and let people add them back in as necessary, but that would probably get people's backs up. Regards, Ground Zero | t 23:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Canadian style numbers (i.e. no comma seperation)
Hi Jeff,

Canada style numbers do not apply in the article on Canada because the WP:MOSNUM supercedes that style. In other words, use a comma every 3 digits. Check out that link and you'll see what I am talking about. Also, see Canada's talk page from the reason on my GDP edit. Happy editing!&mdash;MJCdetroit 01:55, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Baha'U'llah's Family
I just wanted to say I appreciate your recent edits on this page. Wjhonson 16:40, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Syed Jaunpuri OR of Jaunpur
Hi Jeff3000,

As you liked to discuss with DigiBullet on his talk page, I would like to add that initially the article Syed Mohammad Jaunpuri was created by AMahdawi. A follower of that faith as the nick denotes. Later it was lost for some unknown reason. Then I couldn't find that article to link it from the claimants link, a sub section of the Mahdi article. Henceforth I have composed the biographical topic under the article named Syed Mohammad of Jaunpur. I would suggest that whichever page is more complete that must be left alone and the other one deleted. BTW, I too am from the members of the same belief, I can comprehensively shed light on the subject, holding strictly to the NOPV requirement. History could be much reliably recorded from the people of the land about which the history is to be gathered. Accuracy may be deduced by cross checking with the critics. Azgs 07:17, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Viv Craig
Dear Jeff,

Just by chance I noticed that you have proposed the article Vivien Craig for deletion. In future can you follow the procedure set out in the AfD article:

' Notify the creator and/or main contributor(s) of the article when nominating, as they may be able to address concerns raised. Templates ... are available to this purpose.  '

As the creator and main contributor I would have appreciated a right to reply rather than just have to stumble on the deletion by accident.

Thanks AndrewRT 14:41, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

BBC Cite
The BBC citation you are refering to states : "The festival lasts just over a month. The authorities have spent millions of dollars on security and other arrangements with in excess of 30 million people expected to attend" - which is different from what you are using it to cite: Around 70 million people (followers of Hinduism) from around the world participated in Kumbh Mela at one of the Hindu Holy city Prayag (India). -- The BBC also explicitly state that non-hindus were present, with India attempting to attract tourists to the event, which is at odds with what you have re-added. --Irishpunktom\talk 15:12, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * providing you put the word "probably" in front of it, and remove the figure. --Irishpunktom\talk 15:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Which do? Which reliable source posts a statement in this regard that reports on the fact, and does not speculate on the future event? --Irishpunktom\talk 15:43, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Bahai world center photo
Thanks for fixing the caption. &mdash; Zaui (talk) 21:00, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Religion Image
I accept and I'll create an image by removing those two and add Buddhism. Then one image more to add what can I? If you tell your suggestion I'll create it today (now) it self. Please reply as soon as possible because here it's over mid night already. Thank you. - Paul Raj 19:37, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * My suggestion is to add Ayyavazh to that. The only defet is it was not officially recognised. On the other hand it one of the complex religious systems in the world. So I strongly suggest it And so I said that. - Paul Raj 19:41, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Are you telling the most populous religions only be placed. - Paul Raj 19:44, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I accept. - Paul Raj 19:46, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

RE: Lieutenant-Governor (Canada) RM
Hi there! I hope you're well. Inexplicably, this has mushroomed; please weigh in (again). Thanks! E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 21:47, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


 * TY! E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 01:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Greetings!
Hello! I hope you're well. Thanks for your greeting and primer. I stumbled across Wikipedia a little while ago and proceeded to edit a smattering of articles (at first anonymously); now, somewhat hooked, I decided to register with a user name – it is cryptic, but that's the intent! :)

In any event, I look forward to building the Canada and other articles with you and fellow Wikipedians. And please let me know if I can be of assistance to you. Thanks again! A the 0th | talk | 03:58, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Your editing at Canada
Keep up the good work! Jkelly 23:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Indeed. That article has greatly improved (in spite of our subpage disagreement). --mav 16:24, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank You
Thanks for catching the changes to my user site Did you report it? How did you catch it so quickly? In any event, thanks again  --dep369 16:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Dep369

Keep a an eye on this one
I may be wrong(I have been once or twice) but I think a user that placed a sockpuppet tag on a few days ago has returned. I had been plagued by that other user(users) for quite a while, once you tagged him and George Money "evidenced" him a little more he disappeared. Well, I think he's back in the form of this guy. Maybe I am WAY too premature on this and I will assume good faith as best I can but this new user's modus operandi is starting out very similar to the previous sock(s). If you happen across him and his edits turn out to be legit, please let me know. And as mentioned earlier on your talk page....Great work on the Canada article!. Cheers and take care! Anger22 12:26, 19 May 2006 (UTC)


 * FYI...he's back. First United Kingdom..then Singapore. Keep an eye out for him on the pages you frequent. Cheers! Anger22 10:36, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Canada refs
A thorough discussion was made 4 years ago when we decided to get rid of subpages. --mav 14:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC)


 * You have 3 reverts so far. Make a 4th and you will be blocked. --mav 15:02, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: Portland to Montreal
Hi there, thanks for the note. Well, I guess I don't like to take the "normal course"! I came up here for several reasons, including the anthropology department at UdeM being really good, wanting to learn more French, and needing to get out of the States for a while. And just for overall change and adventure. But I do miss Portland! rom a rin [talk to her ] 20:22, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

LaboUr of love
Thanks;) Masterhatch 04:28, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Selam Ahderom
Wasn't this page already deleted? I can't recall exactly what happened, but I think someone re-created the page after it was deleted. Do you have any suggestion on what to do? Cuñado  -  Talk  07:06, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 02:57, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Hey
Hey Joturner, We've never communicated, but looking at your edits, I think you are definitely a fair editor. I just wanted to tell you that passing the RFA or not should not be a big deal. I've always felt that the process is overly political, and that more than anything it causes dissension. So just keep up the good work. -- Jeff3000 03:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the input. It's always appreciated. joturn e r 03:59, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Template:Bahá'í-2
Greetings Jeff3000, I just wanted to inform you that partially due to your concerns about how Tnavbar appeared on Template:Bahá%27í-2 I went ahead and made Template:Tnavbar-mini and swapped out the older larger template with this new one. I tried to get the formatting to look as best I could and I wanted to see if you felt that it was an improvement. Please let me know. Thanks. Netscott 21:54, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

RE: Canada
Whatever. As you will probably note, the Canada article has endured much revision recently and not. If you think that the article should remain static and imprecise (as it currently does), regardless of whether it has achieved "FAC" status and upon one user's suggestion, then I will not waste my time discussing the issue or editing amongst dilettantes. Good luck to you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.150.134.59 (talk • contribs).

e-mail
My wireless internet provider (Verizon) cut me off due to excessive use (apparently the unlimited broadband plan is neither unlimited, nor for broadband services). Anyway, so I'm connected to a very very weak wi-fi signal, and I can't reliably connect to my mail server. I can get mail at the office, so I'll answer you later. --Christian Edward Gruber 11:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Coments and/or complaints
I have no idea how you got the idea i vandalised soemthing. I've never even heard of gah12345, the other two i know, but they don't vandalise either. -Wovelscotch 21:24, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Capital and Bold 'I' in first para of Religion and your correction.
From vkvora2001 to Jeff3000

Dear Friend single - (dash) in para of Religion read as capital and bold I and I request you to do the needful from your end. vkvora 04:24, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

address
I've been awol for a few months now - mostly because I found I was contributing less and moaning more so just wasting everyone's time :). Email is up and running. If this is well out of date (well - 3 months) then just ignore this.

Tata -- Tomhab 12:13, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Prayer
Looks like he's got the message. Rich Farmbrough 21:15 6 June 2006 (UTC).


 * I'll repost my reply since it was deleted (Gee, you guys as censor happy). The only message I got is that there's a serious double standard on links. No one has provided a legitimate reason for removing the link. Dannycarlton 21:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

World Junior Hockey Championships (or whatever they are called
I just added a merge proposal tag to Ice Hockey World Junior Championships to blend it with World Junior Ice Hockey Championships. They are both well written, but about same topic. ... ColtsScore 08:12, 9 June 2006 (UTC) By the way, do you know about WikiProject Ice Hockey. It looks like you have an interest in hockey, and we'd love to have your help ! :) ColtsScore 08:18, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi again Jeff3000. Just a little favour to ask. Even if you're not joining the WikiProject Ice Hockey, if you're creating any ice hockey related articles, could you add the onto their talk pages? (just the two curly brackets and 'ice hockey' between them) That'd really help out. Also, thanks for coming in on the debate about World Jr.Championships (or whatever we're calling them :) ColtsScore 12:11, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Baha'i writings deleted from wikisource.
Hey dude. Check out wikisource - all our hard work was undone. I put a note requesting a policy change on the deletion policy talk page, but the Baha'i Library terms of use were not GFDL terms and therefore it was removed (even though some of the english translations can be sourced from older publications now in the public domain). Because we don't lurk on wikisource, we missed the notice on (at least my) talk pages and they were deleted. No e-mails were sent that I am aware of, even though I have set my e-mail address in the preferences. Grrr, that's so frustrating. --Christian Edward Gruber 15:56, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


 * So it was a policy-related thing, and the admins/bureaucrats are being nice. Birgitte is restoring them temporarily so I can back them up (we put a lot of work into the formatting).  We need to consult with the archives folks as to how to proceed, whether we use older publications which have passed into public domain (where possible), whether the world centre could release them under a dual license, with one being GFDL-compatible, etc.  Let's discuss where to go with them. --Christian Edward Gruber 17:27, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

THANKS
So, I was just about to put something on your talk page asking you to help with some Baha'i (sorry no diacritics) refs on the Cole controversies page, and when I went to the page to find your user name, there the refs were! THanks so much. From the little I have read about Baha'i and love/hate/conflict I actually think you Baha'i folks really must "practice what you preach" because you have been so great to work with. I've never been less attacked when dealing with a controversial topic than on this particular one. THanks :=) Elizmr 14:42, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Revert on religion.
Heh... I missed that one - thanks. It slipped by.

impersonation
I believe you are being impersonated here. --Stephane Charette 01:48, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * No worries. Rich Farmbrough 07:49 14 June 2006 (GMT).

Ayyavazhi
Hi Jeff

There has been a lot of discussion on the India talk pages regarding the notablity of Ayyavazhi. We had to do a major cleanup after it was found that a single user had created links to the Ayyavazhi pages from every possible WP page. One including the Menstrual cycle page! If you feel it is appropriate to include a link to a very obscure religion with a miniscule following, in the List of religions page, then go ahead and do it. I won't remove it. - Cheers Parthi 02:05, 14 June 2006 (UTC)


 * As mentioned in Talk:India, the government of India does not even consider it as a religion. Tintin (talk) 05:08, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism
Hi, you recently left a vandalism warning on my talkpage - which edits of mine have you considered vandalism? Or could this be an impersonation? Please get back to me ASAP Sfacets 03:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Canada
Thanks for all of the hard work you do keeping the article from degrading. Jkelly 01:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

William Miller article
I've already pointed out how it *does* provide context to show the whole quote. The entire quote is more neutral than the snipped quote. If you disagree post to the talk page to discuss how and why. Wjhonson 16:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

NHL
You're right about the ISBN issue; I was going off of this Library of Congress page; it seems the book must have two titles. In any event, with the problems fixed, I'm going to withdraw my objection. --RobthTalk 04:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Re:User:Nateirma
Not really, because to protect the talk page would mean no-one except admins could post messages there. So unless another block is due for vandalism (removing warnings on it's own isn't really vandalism) then I can't protect. Just assume the messages have been read and post future warnings on that basis. Petros471 20:41, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Use of ref tags
What exactly did you mean by "not use as this article is not in that style" in your edit summary here. I have never heard of references which were unsuitable for use with the ref/references system. I put the ref tag around it as that is the way to use the system to have inline citations which are summarised at the bottom. Idealling it should use cite web instead of just the link to detail when it was accessed, its title and publisher. Ans e ll 23:51, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Administrator
Requests for adminship/Salman01

Image:Esslemont.jpg
Hey, could you help with this image. You seem to know what you're doing when it comes to copyright tags. I tried to use a fair use tag but someone asked for an explanation. Cuñado  -  Talk  02:46, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Sandbox
No, I don't mind at all. I had hoped to do more to it already, but there you go. --Christian Edward Gruber 17:58, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * BTW, Felicitations on the anniversary of the Martyrdom of the Bab. Now go to sleep, you maniac. --Christian Edward Gruber 04:06, 9 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Hey Jeff, is there a template that you subst for signing anon/unsigned comments, or do you cut/paste your little "this comment was blah blah" thing? --Christian Edward Gruber 14:28, 9 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Nah, you signed - you just didn't close your nowiki tag, so it didn't get counted as wiki-text, and resolved to your sig. --Christian Edward Gruber 22:56, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Stephen Harper
Hi. Could you take a look at Talk:Stephen Harper? There is a lot of talk about what image to use, but no real leadership on getting the issue resolved. Images in question are at commons:Category:Stephen Harper. Thanks. Jkelly 20:40, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I suggest bringing it to the attention of User:Kirill Lokshin. I am unquestionably too involved at this point to take any administrator action, and I suspect that User:Angr would feel much the same.  Jkelly 17:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Richard St. Barbe Baker
Hi, Jeff. Great to find another admirer of R. St. Barbe Baker. Thanks for all your contributions... especially, recently, your structuring, adding to and amending it.

I do not know much about the Baha'i faith, as you may have realized from my contributions to the article... though I did not attempt to leave it out.

I live in B.C. and am concerned with forests... have been a watershed activist, planter of trees, event coordinator, and environmental writer for magazines, newspapers, websites, etc. Also (like RSBB), attracted to organic gardening and carpentry at a young age. I've worked on a lot of eco/environmental/cultural articles here on Wikipedia.

Anyway, thanks again!

Joel Russ


 * Jeff wrote (on my page)... "It's wonderful that you are so active in trying to better the world we live in. I really wish we had more people who were more concerned with the environment. While, I'm not an environmentalist by profession, I do try to do my small part in helping the environment. I think, generally most Baha'is, are concerned with the environment and see the exploitation of our planetary natural resources as one of the symptoms of an overly materialistic society, that only considers short-term economic growth, and does not benefit all of humanity, and cannot concern itself with the long-term viability of life on earth."


 * You put it very well, Jeff, which maybe is to say your expression of it matches my own feeling pretty well.


 * Joel Russ

Your violation of Wikipedia Policy
Hi Jeff - I'm sure you would want to know that the use of Google's corporate trademark on your user page is against Wikipedia fair use policy; I've done you the courtesy of removing it from your User page so you can be in complete compliance with the rules. As you can see, the infobox for google uses Image:Google logo transparent.png which is copyright, meaning you were breaking WP policy by displaying the image on your user page. I've removed the offensive userbox and would advise you in future to abide by Wikipedia's policy on fair use images. For more information on why fair use images are not permitted on User pages, see User Talk: Durin who specializes in these matters.Michael Dorosh 04:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Did you not notice that there is no image in the Google template, but it is just coloured text. I've reverted your change. -- Jeff3000 04:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)