User talk:Jeff359w

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! NtheP (talk) 11:31, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome, and a note about signing on talk pages
Hi there - just thought I'd drop you off some links to pages that might help you navigate Wikipedia. Also, to note that it's a good idea to sign your posts on talk pages, to help others keep track: you can do that by typing four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of your comment. Happy editing! Gonzonoir (talk) 15:57, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


 * }

April 2012
Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:American Catholic Church in the United States. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information about a user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's harassment policy. Wikipedia policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted or removed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is there to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors may result in you being blocked from editing. StAnselm (talk) 02:40, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

I understand. My apologies. It will not happen again. Jeff359w (talk) 13:06, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Your article edits were removed as a copyright violation - of what, I'm not sure. But certainly, the material you added would have to be extensively rewritten before it is suitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia. I am happy to help, but I am going to be very busy in real life for the next couple of days. StAnselm (talk) 13:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * If you wish to establish notability of the article clearly, one way which might work would be to consult the Melton book, already included as a reference, and list any references he cites in his own book. Also, if any of the sources listed here which refer to the group are independent, refer specifically to the group in question (as opposed to other groups who include the words in their name) and provide some degree of substantial discussion of the group, that would help establish notability as per WP:NOTABILITY as well. John Carter (talk) 21:07, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

John:

Thank you for your help!Jeff359w (talk) 21:53, 24 April 2012 (UTC)