User talk:JeffBordeaux

Welcome!

Hello, JeffBordeaux, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Chellie Campbell, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gaijin42 (talk) 20:32, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Chellie Campbell


A tag has been placed on Chellie Campbell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gaijin42 (talk) 20:32, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Chellie Campbell
- SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:29, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chellie Campbell


A tag has been placed on Chellie Campbell, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 00:56, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Chellie Campbell
Hi there. Thanks, and welcome to Wikipedia. While looking through new pages, I saw you created an article on Chellie Campbell which looks pretty good, and it's also good that you've added some references at the bottom. I thought I might let you know that we often will put the sources in the text, we call this referencing in-line. You can find an explanation on how to do this here. If you get stuck, don't hesitate to ask me for help on my talk page. You can also ask for help at our help page for newer users or place here with a request and someone will be around soon to help you out. Happy editing! :) Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  09:28, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Pointless
Please read this. If you get a properly licensed image of the woman, it should be uploaded to the Commons. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:01, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chellie Campbell


A tag has been placed on Chellie Campbell, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 03:55, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

May 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Talk:The Boyd Company, Inc.. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Boyd_Company,_Inc.&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chip123456 (talk) 16:15, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Articles for creation/Local Splash.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! KTC (talk) 12:08, 26 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Well it didn't help that I couldn't see the references when I reviewed the submission. Having fixed the references afterwards, and looking at it again, I would say it's borderline on failing Wikipedia notability requirement. I'm happy to undo my decision and let someone else take another look at it. KTC (talk) 17:42, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Articles for creation/Local Splash.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Millermk90 (talk) 20:08, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I've left another comment at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Local Splash. I suggest you resubmit the article for another editor to review.  I'm not sure about the notability because while the article wizard indeed contains the text you left at my talk page, the actual wikipedia policies (Notability & Notability (organizations and companies)) don't mention listing in indices as a valid criteria for notability.  You may also wish to check the other concerns I mentioned, and see if you think they are valid.  Millermk90 (talk) 05:41, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Local Splash


A tag has been placed on Local Splash requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. SmartSE (talk) 22:08, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Local Splash


The article Local Splash has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I can't find any significant independent coverage of this company as WP:CORP requires. I can only find press releases and the rankings are not sufficiently in depth.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 22:51, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Local Splash for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Local Splash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Local Splash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 20:25, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
Hello, JeffBordeaux. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Local Splash, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 17:44, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Only warning
I've reviewed your contributions to Wikipedia over the last several months. Virtually all your contributions during this period are oriented around promoting your clients. Wikipedia is not the place for you to promote your employer (and clients). If you make one more promotional edit, I will immediately block your account for an indefinite period of time. The only reason I am not doing so now is so that you may defend yourself and your edits (if you wish) on the various talk or deletion pages. If this is not clear, please comment below and I will respond shortly. Rklawton (talk) 22:38, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

You should also mention that your previous account was User:ThuggiesDotNet. While there's nothing wrong with creating a new account to replace an account with an inappropriate name (Thuggies left it unclear whether you were editing as an individual or as an organization), you should disclose the name of the prior account so that your editing is more transparent - especially when editing the same article even though it's after the previous account has been blocked. Rklawton (talk) 03:28, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chellie Campbell concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chellie Campbell, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Chellie Campbell


Hello JeffBordeaux. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Chellie Campbell.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 19:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)