User talk:Jeff 21 on the sand

February 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to BBC Breakfast has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:51, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: BBC Breakfast was changed by Jeff 21 on the sand (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874229 on 2017-02-04T08:51:03+00:00.

Recent edit to BBC Breakfast
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that changein particular, your adding of "Example Example Example" could confuse new users. Consider making your edits in the sandbox first, and then copying them to the article once done. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Psiĥedelisto (talk) 09:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

BBC Breakfast edits
Hello. Please refer to the article's talk page before re-adding the "episode guide". This is against Wikipedia policy, specifically WP:NOTTVGUIDE. If you continue to re-add it, I will report you to an administrator for edit warring. Thanks, Corkythe hornetfan  (ping me) 19:59, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at BBC Breakfast. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 07:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)