User talk:Jeff Dahl/Archive 1

Welcome! Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Mak (talk)  18:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Mosque of Amr
Thanks for the great picture! Do you have any others of Old Cairo? I'm currently working on several articles about that area and am very interested in other images, whether they're of buildings, or of a view, or just of empty streets. What do you have available? :) --Elonka 22:23, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd still love to see your photos, if you have them on a webpage somewhere? If nothing else, they help give me an idea of what's on the "tourist trail" in Old Cairo.  :)  I do understand what you mean about pics already being up though.  For example, when I went to Vietnam & Cambodia, I took some fantastic pics, but most of the pages that I checked on Wikipedia already had better quality pics than what I'd taken!  :) Also, that's interesting about the Giza blocks.  If you do find any sources on anything like that, feel free to add them to the appropriate articles, or point me at them and I'll see what I can do.  :) --Elonka 09:45, 26 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Wow, those bhuddist temples have a great style about them, made better by how the jungle has grown in around them. That would make a fascinating trip. Anyway, I put some of my favorite Egypt shots in a web album: http://picasaweb.google.com/bynars99/EgyptPhotosJune2005. Enjoy, Jeff Dahl 01:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Beautiful pics, thanks for posting them! My #1 request is that other Mosque of Amr photo.  The Hatsheput pic is beautiful too.  Do you have an account at the Commons?  If not, I highly recommend creating one, and uploading these photos (feel free to post all of them).  It's always good to have alternate images that show a slightly different angle of something.  You could add your Cairo photos to this category: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Cairo and the Hatshepsut pic could go here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Hatshepsut .  Then they'd be available to all the different language WikiProjects. For a license, I recommend Creative Commons, Shared Attribution, though public domain works too. Or if this is too confusing, don't worry, just go ahead and upload here to the English Wikipedia, and I can get things moved over to Commons later. Are you in IMs?  If so, let me know your handle and I can help talk you through some of this. Thanks again for the help, Elonka 01:58, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I put the best examples up on the commons, maybe one or two will find their way into an article. I use the gmail messaging, my email is bynars99@gmail.com.Jeff Dahl 23:21, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Invitation
Hey there. I see you've been doing some excellent work on chemistry and pharmacology articles. Would you like to join WikiProject Pharmacology? It's sort of a "task force" of editors dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of pharmacy and pharmacology articles, and all are more than welcome to help. Either way, thanks again, and keep up the good work! Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 16:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I would like to join but I don't know how. I am a grad student in medicinal chemistry at University of Illinois at Chicago, and I spent a few years working as a pharmacy technician before coming here. I mostly do analytical work (in mass spectrometry) but I consider myself first and foremost a chemist. I'll check out the wikiproject page and see what's going on, and hopefully can find some ways to contribute. Jeff Dahl 16:52, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks again. You may join the project by adding your name to the Participants list—it's as simple as that :) We're also currently organizing a Collaboration of the Week. Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:43, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Proposal to merge Acular into Ketorolac
Hi! thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I'm interested in your comments at Talk:Ketorolac, if you don't mind. --Jdlh | Talk 07:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Dimethylfuran
Thanks for creating the figure for 2,5-dimethylfuran! Unfortunately there is a small error in the first intermediate, which should have just one double bond, rather than two. As it is now it has two pentavalent carbon atoms! Cheers, Itub 15:46, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Whoops! I'll fix it right away. Thanks for pointing that out. Jeff Dahl 15:51, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week
Aspirin has been selected as this week's Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week! Please help us bring this article up to featured standards during the week. The goal is to nominate this at WP:FAC on September 10, 2007.

Also, please visitWP:RxCOTW to support other articles for the next COTW. Articles that have been nominated thus far include Doxorubicin, Paracetamol (in the lead with 4 support votes so far), Muscle relaxant, Ethanol, and Bufotenin.

In other news:


 * Bupropion has been promoted to featured status on August 31, 2007.


 * The WikiProject Pharmacology main page has been updated and overhauled, to make it easier to find things, as well as to highlight other goals and announcements for the project.


 * Garrondo is asking for individuals to help review Therapies for multiple sclerosis, as he is considering nominating this article for GA status.


 * Fvasconcellos notes that discussion is ongoing regarding the current wording of MEDMOS on including dosage information in drug articles. All input is welcome.

Dr. Cash 00:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Random Smile!


WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. - Warthog Demon  20:03, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Pharmacology Update
Here's a brief update in some of the recent developments of WikiProject Pharmacology!


 * Aspirin has just completed its two week run as the first Collaboration of the Week! Many thanks to those editors that contributed; the article got a lot of good work accomplished, and in particular, much work was done in fixing up the history section. It's still not quite "done" yet (is a wikipedia article really ever done?), but after two weeks I think it's more important to push onwards with the development of the new collaboration of the week program. I will be fixing up Aspirin in the next few days and possibly nominating it for either GA or FA status.


 * Muscle relaxant has been selected as the new Collaboration of the week until October 2, 2007! This article is currently rated as a "stub", so it's got quite a bit of work cut out for collaborators! Admittedly, featured status could be a long way off,... but still attainable! At the least, maybe we could at least get it up to meeting the Good article criteria? Please stop by the article and help improve it.


 * Resveratrol, having recently achieved GA status on August 16, 2007, is now making a run for featured status. This is quite a fascinating compound. If you can, please stop by its discussion page and leave comments in support of it.


 * Please remember that Wikipedia is not a forum for discussing or dispensing medical advice amongst users. Specifically, talk pages of articles should only be used to discuss improving the actual article in question. To help alleviate this situation, the template talkheader may be added to the top of talk pages, reminding users of the purpose of such pages. Additionally, unsigned comments and comments by anonymous users that are inappropriate may be removed from talk pages without being considered vandalism.


 * There was an interesting article on ZDNet last week about Hewlett Packard licensing its patented microneedle technology used in common inkjet printers to be used in transdermal patches to deliver a time-controlled release of drugs to patients. This information could be added to articles such as route of administration or drug delivery.

You are receiving this message because you are listed as one of the participants of WikiProject Pharmacology.

Dr. Cash 04:59, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi Jeff - got your message over on commons, thanks for the invite... I am out and about quite a bit but will cast my eye over the page and see where I can help out... Regards 87.102.123.56 20:44, 24 September 2007 (UTC)and here on Wikipedia Merlin-UK 20:46, 24 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I also got your message re: Ancient Egypt page. I should be able to shift my current focus a bit and at least do a copyedit on it, and provide any references where they might be needed/missing.


 * Were you planning on nominating it for Good article status once everyone's had a hard look at it first?


 * Cheers! Captmondo 17:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I really don't think it's likely to pass for Feature Article status -- having gone through a couple of those already I can spot a couple things on a cursory glance that are not likely to hold up to that level of scrutiny. I'll do a detailed critique of it, but right off the bat I can see occasional instances of "weasel" (i.e. imprecise) wording, lists where there should be prose, I think that much of the "open problem" section is of a dubious nature, and you will definitely not get to FA status with all of those uncited citations. Long way to go for FA (IMHO), but GA is doable.


 * Give me a day or two, then check back to the article for a list of things that need to be changed/altered/cut/improved on the article's discussion page. Cheers! Captmondo 19:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Okay, I've done a quick pass and did a high-level critique of the more obvious faults in the Ancient Egypt article. I also note that apparently this article was once a GA candidate that failed. Unfortunately I can't find the proper link to the critique it must have gone through at that time, but more info could be found there.


 * I can't easily tackle all of the points addressed myself, but if there is a section you would prefer I tackle, let me know! Captmondo 13:21, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Banners
You're right, the terming was different. However, with the merger of the two projects, they look identical, and actually even feed into the same assessment system, making them functionally duplicates. John Carter 23:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thanks! I know we can get it done! Jeff Dahl 22:45, 28 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the barnstar! Appreciated!


 * Still much work to be done on the Ancient Egypt article though. Once I am done filling in the blanks in the History section will need to go over and whittle it down a bit, then provide citations for what's left. Am going to add some further pics in the meantime. Cheers! Captmondo 20:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Chicxulub Crater at FAC
Hey! Thanks for your comments at peer review. I think I've addressed most of your concerns, and I was wondering if you would bother reading the article again and responding on the FAC page. Thanks, David Fuchs ( talk  ) 11:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * On my user or talk page, just click 'Email this user' on the left sidebar in 'toolbox'. David Fuchs ( talk  ) 19:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I think I've addressed your considerations. David Fuchs ( talk  ) 19:58, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

AncientEgyptBanner
Hi, I have changed the template, to show the importance, can you see whether it "works" as expected, I've checked a few articles, and they look OK. Markh 20:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Hokusai image
The one you swopped to is a facsimile of 100 years later than the original, and should not be used in articles on art, nor any article without making this very clear. Johnbod 00:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Because they are not the same thing at all. These are NOT reprints using the same blocks, but are copies created from scratch (using the same methods) by people with an original in front of them. The description on the file makes that perfectly clear. We would not dream of (knowingly) putting up a Rembrandt that was a copy of a hundred years later. I went through all this on two debates on the Great Wave from this series at Commons (I don't know what happened in the end). On that one several people pointed out there were actually easy to spot differences in the composition - probably here too. Actually in this case, unlike most of the series, there is very little difference in quality of scan between the two. The copy Great Wave is a much better scan, no doubt of a much brighter original. But we should not be using them. Johnbod 01:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

FPC Nom
Hi Jeff,

Just letting you know I've uploaded a new 'less cropped' version of the Hymenocallis speciosa flower nom on FPC if you want to take another look. --jjron 15:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

FL Main page mockup
I am not sure if you have seen WP:FC. It contains a section where a few hundred of the WP:FLs have been excerpted. As I imagine it, the new section would use the work already done there to create the excerpts. Thus, we would just take the FL section from FC and put it at the bottom of the main page at first.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 20:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Addendum - Do you have a problem with the WP:LOTDP layout for nominations?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 20:09, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * P.S. I have a juggler picture you might like in the gallery at Chicago Marathon.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 20:09, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, Jeff!
... for all your helpful suggestions with Restoration of the Sistine Chapel frescoes, and in particular your generous comments about my literary style.... I mmade a few more of the changes that you recommended..... and a little gold star suddenly popped up in the corner!

Well, the big decision now is whether to put up Leonardo da Vinci which a lot of people have had a hand in, or something less challenging! All the best! Amandajm 07:32, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. See my reply on your talk page. Jeff Dahl 21:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * OK! I've already dealt with a lot of the issus that were raised and it's greatly improved. I don't reaaly think it needs too much more doing to it. The really hard part was trying to cite info that other people had written, and which I didn't want to remove. Everybody likes to have their contribution there somewhwere. one of the ways I got around the problem was to create 3 new pages and put all the Science and invention on one, all the Dan Brownish stuff on another, and all the speculation about pederast relationships on another.... something for everyone.... Would you believe that when I started work on the Leonardo page, there was a list of his paintings, but no information about his career as an artist.


 * Anyway, currently I'm doing a little bit of work on one of my particular loves, the Australian architect Edmund Blacket. There are a few glaring holes that have been filled in wiith speculation, when actually the facts are known from his diaries and letters. So this is easy... Amandajm 00:09, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks you for the peer review. I can see we have our work cut out for us. Yes, this does badly need to be reoutlined; the edit wars have taken their toll. Captain Zyrain 21:09, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Good luck, and let me know if you need another look. Jeff Dahl 21:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Response
Hello Jeff Dalh, I've added a response to your message here. selfworm Talk ) 21:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
That barnstar means a lot to me :-) Ta bu shi da yu 07:10, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

pictures from the Book of the Dead
The author of the book contends that these pictures are reproductions of reconstructions of the original text. I'd quite believe him - these pictures were high quality, certainly not verbatim copies of 2000+ year old papyrus, there is clearly some work involved in reconstructing them. As for sending messages, we have hundreds and hundreds of emails in OTRS to process, no time to discuss every one of the issue. David.Monniaux 15:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the peer review on Matrikas. It's much appreciated.TheRingess (talk) 22:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Matrikas
Thank you for your suggestions in the peer review. Please elaborate on sections with the "coin" analogy.--Redtigerxyz 05:48, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

On the prose of Rob-B-Hood
As I said in the reply, there are more changes pending. I'm a bit busy IRL, so it would take me time to improve the article. However, the film's been peer reviewed before: WikiProject Films/Peer review/Rob-B-Hood. Could you give some examples of problematic prose? Which sections need the most fixes?

As for the homosexual security van drivers part, it's based on this dialog in the film.


 * Guard 1: What? Another robber in a motorcycle?
 * Guard 2: He's... handsome.

And after the car chase.


 * Guard 2: Backup surely was fast! And it's all thanks to you.
 * Guard 1: Where are you from?
 * Guard 2: I'm from Broke Broke Mountain.

Those phrases were the homo jokes in the film, and I think I will just use the film itself as a source.-- Alasdair 18:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC)


 * OK, here's a follow up. Gram123 and I have done some copyediting of the prose of the article, and attempted to improve the flow of the plot. I've removed some redundant sentences and merged several short paragraphs, and ordered them in a more logical order. I'd be glad if you take another look at it, and inform me of any problematic areas that still exist. Let's hope the League of Copyeditors don't have to get involved. (They are slow.) Cheers.-- Alasdair 12:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Golden Film
Thank you for your vote and comments to the featured article candidacy of Golden Film. I changed several things in the article and posted a response on the candidate page. Furtermore, I am willing to further expand the article, do you have any suggestions? – Ilse@ 18:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

I have a question. On the FA-candidate page of Golden Film, you wrote: "Keep at it, it needs expansion because there is more to the story than this". After I have used many of the suggestions and comments from the FA-candidate page to improve the article, do you still think there is information missing? Do you have any suggestions of what is "more to it"? – Ilse@ 23:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Alanya Peer Review
Hi Jeff, I just got around to making the edits on the Alanya article which you recommended at the peer review, and I just wanted to say thank you for taking the time to look over the article, and that your suggestions did indeed improve the article. Thanks again!--Patrick Ѻ 19:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Tiled roof in Dubrovnik-edit.jpg
Thank for help at Image:Tiled roof in Dubrovnik-edit.jpg Featured picture candidates! I tried write more at the description and add a geocode. What can be good at the caption? Can you take a look on that? Thank you very much for help --Beyond silence 07:40, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Fellow Egypt Lover
Hey, Jeff, just wanted to say that it's awesome to finally find someone on Wikipedia that has an interest in Ancient Egypt! Just wondering, do you know what they did to the Ancient Egypt page? I added an extra paragraph, but they deleted it along with some other important info on Egypt. If you can find a way to reply to this, can you? Thanks!

User:Abluescarab

Thanks for the advice, but now that I know what to do, I think I'll wait the four days.

Abluescarab 03:34, 22 October 2007 (UTC)