User talk:Jeff Defender

Golden-Road.net
A tag has been placed on Golden-Road.net, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:Golden-Road.net. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hatch68 20:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Do not remove speedy delete templates
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Hatch68 21:08, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Place   on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
 * 2) Make your case on the article's .

Please do not file frivolous AfDs
Your AfD of one of the greatest legends in all of billiards, at Articles for deletion/Alfredo DeOro is baseless. Please read Deletion policy before filing any more AfDs that are not justified, as their resolution is time consuming for everyone involved. The only issues you raised were that the article stub wasn't "useful" to you, which is not a valid deletion criterion, and "vanity", which is clearly impossible since the subject has been dead for two generations! The subject is notable beyond question, and the facts in the article are sourced, leaving no deletion basis at all. If you simply feel (and I would agree) that the article is too skeletal and needs expanding, all you need to do is flag it with Expand at the top (I've already done that in this case), and someone will get around to working on it. Thank you.&mdash; SMcCandlish &#91;talk&#93; &#91;contrib&#93; ツ 00:37, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Your February 14, 2007 advertising edit to "The Price Is Right (US game show)" article
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. &mdash; SMcCandlish &#91;talk&#93; &#91;contrib&#93; ツ 10:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Your opposition
Please don't take this the wrong way, but I noticed you are opposing my RfA because I support the blocking of vandal-only accounts. You may not know this, but the blocking policy allows for just this: "User accounts with persistent violations may be blocked indefinitely." I am not aware of any guideline against blocking vandals simply because they might open sock accounts. &mdash;dgies tc 16:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi, I believe you voted twice in my RfA.  &mdash;dgies tc 21:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Jeff Defender for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. WooyiTalk, Editor review 00:33, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * User:Honda Pilot has been confirmed via checkuser to be a sockpuppet of User:Jeff Defender. — SMcCandlish &#91;talk&#93; &#91;cont&#93;   ‹(-¿-)› 18:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)