User talk:Jeff G./Archives/2011/July

Not a personal attack on the bot...

 * Not meant to be a personal attack on the bot. :) :) but a tongue in cheek chide of the bot. Of course it does not suck, met to be a somewhat funny actually. But the bot does have issues though. Bot should be looking at one those that use a www field in the cite area. Not journals or book or whatever else. DeusImperator (talk) 11:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)


 * This edit didn't include the words "idiot editors"? Also, cite templates have no "www" fields and I haven't run the bot in over three weeks due to other concerns.  —  Jeff G.  ツ  12:43, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

vandal
please tell me how changing "partner" to "relationship" can be consindered vadalisum??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.224.188.94 (talk) 19:11, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * "Relationship" is not a valid parameter for Template:Infobox person. Neither is "fucking".  The correct parameter name is "partner" per Template:Infobox person/doc, and since you effectively removed the information about the partner of James Roday from the James Roday article, I interpreted your edit as "unexplained removal of content" AKA vandalism.   —  Jeff G.  ツ  19:19, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Help
hello there

the page which I created I need some help UKRockers, many users keep trying to remove it as they state there is no reason for it but I and many others think it does

can you help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarvis1983uk (talk • contribs) 19:56, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The article needs to satisfy WP:CLUB, in addition to providing verifiable references from reliable sources. It did not appear to do that when you wrote to me.  —  Jeff G.  ツ  20:45, 31 July 2011 (UTC)