User talk:Jeff Rudd

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 11:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:05, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 13:15, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --CommieMark (talk) 16:56, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

As you have identified yourself as a spokesperson for Direct Democracy Ireland it is inappropriate for you to continue editing that wikipage. Please see Conflict of interest --CommieMark (talk) 16:59, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.--CommieMark (talk) 17:16, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Neutral point of view
Hi Jeff. Welcome to Wikipedia. I just posted at the COIN Noticeboard in the above noted discussion thread. Thank you for engaging in talk page discussion to determine the best way to improve the Direct Democracy Ireland page. There are a variety of ways within Wikipedia to get editors to address your concern with the Direct Democracy Ireland page. Your direct editing of the article is not one of the good ways, since you have a Conflict of interest with the topic. See wp:COI which notes that Conflict of interest (COI) editing is strongly discouraged. I opened up a thread at Neutral point of view/Noticeboard. Since you first began editing, the page has change as shown here. If you still have concerns with the Direct Democracy Ireland page, please post them here. -- Jreferee (talk) 02:12, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Murry1975 (talk) 22:07, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
This is your last warning. The next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at Talk:Direct Democracy Ireland, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Murry1975 (talk) 17:57, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Jeff Rudd
User:Jeff Rudd, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jeff Rudd and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Jeff Rudd during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Stalwart 111  23:58, 11 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I have deleted that page for two reasons. Firstly and less importantly, the content was copied from here, and you'd have to provide evidence that you are indeed the copyright holder and have the right to re-publish it under a free license. Secondly, that content attacked other editors and provided no relevant evidence. Having an interest in the topic we edit is not by itself a conflict of interest. Accusing others of lying without a shred of supporting evidence is not acceptable. Huon (talk) 23:31, 16 September 2013 (UTC)