User talk:Jeff Wilke

A tag has been placed on Justin Tanner, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Finngall  talk  17:49, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi Jeff. On closer inspection it seems that Justin Tanner may deserve an article on Wikipedia. I will recreate a basic version - please feel free to add to it.
 * What I would ask - and this will help administrators in the future - is that you have a look at Wikipedia policies and the Manual of style. This helps us as it shows an article was written by someone who understands the way Wikipedia works. Articles that start with personal messages, or read like essays or hagiography, or consist mainly of quotes, are apt to make us delete without reading the whole article. I assure you, you have no idea how many articles are submitted daily to Wikipedia about people with no claim to notability at all.


 * Anyway, here is the article back, and I hope you stick around.

P.S. When you are writing to talk pages, please sign what you post by placing four tildes at the end like this. ~ DJ Clayworth (talk) 14:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)