User talk:Jeffcase327

November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Voice of San Diego has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://twitter.com/rdotinga (matching the regex rule \btwitter\.com\b). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:35, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Voice of San Diego
You seem to have some sort of axe to grind with Randy Dotinga and Voice of San Diego. I don't think a reasonable person would view him becoming a freelancer three months after he wrote his piece in the CSM to be a conflict of interest, since it all happened months after the fact. Unless you are alleging some more nefarious scheme to write a fraudulent article in the CSM either to boost VOSD or get a job there. At the very least, the issue is debatable. As a result, I've added a "citation needed" list to the page. If you can find criticism of the Dotinga article on the web to link to, it seems to be a reasonable compromise. But as it is, you're spreading innuendo. I might as well add an item that says Jeff Case may also have a conflict of interest in disliking Voice of San Diego. I mean, it _might_ be true, right? Let's keep it to the facts. I think disclosing that Dotinga went on to write for VOSD lets the readers make up their own minds about whether or not that source is relevant. Jsnell (talk) 17:22, 24 December 2009 (UTC)