User talk:Jeffer Stein

November 2009
Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Navtech, you will be blocked from editing. Wuh Wuz  Dat  19:03, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Navtech, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  19:07, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Your addition to Navtech has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Your recent edits added text from © Navtech 2009   Wuh  Wuz  Dat  19:17, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, as you did with Navtech, you will be blocked from editing. Wuh Wuz  Dat  19:41, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Misleading edit summary
On [this edit, you claimed to be "changing some typos", when, in fact, your edit had nothing to do with any typographical errors. [[User:Wuhwuzdat| Wuh ]] Wuz Dat  19:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Jeffer Stein for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Wuh Wuz  Dat  19:57, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

You have been. (blocked by MuZemike 01:35, 17 November 2009 (UTC))

You may contest this block by adding the text below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. You admitted your COI here Wuh  Wuz  Dat  06:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)