User talk:Jefferyseow/Archive 2009/

Proposed deletion of Stuart Herriot


The article Stuart Herriot has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Person with no apparent notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 15:02, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Choa Chong Long


The article Choa Chong Long has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Person with no apparent notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 15:22, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kiong Kong Tuan


The article Kiong Kong Tuan has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Person with no apparent notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 15:25, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kiong Seok Wee


The article Kiong Seok Wee has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Person with no apparent notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 15:26, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wee Boon Teck


The article Wee Boon Teck has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Person with no apparent notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 15:28, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lim Ho Puah


The article Lim Ho Puah has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Person with no apparent notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 15:30, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wee Seong Kang


The article Wee Seong Kang has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Person with no apparent notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 15:31, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tan Boo Liat


The article Tan Boo Liat has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Person with no apparent notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 15:32, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cheah Tek Soon


The article Cheah Tek Soon has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Person with no apparent notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 15:34, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * P.S. If you ever need any help - administrator or otherwise - feel free to drop me a line and I will be happy to help. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:25, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Image-OngHockThyeChiefJusticeofMalaya.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Image-OngHockThyeChiefJusticeofMalaya.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

More: While you claim to have possession of the photo this does not confer you with any rights to its copyright. The image is a professional portrait, and unless it was a work for hire, the photographer most likely owns the copyright. We need more information about when it was taken and author before we can be sure this is out of copyright. ww2censor (talk) 16:09, 30 September 2009 (UTC)


 * BTW, the daughter may not have the right to any copyright over the image and while she may have given you permission to use this on Wikipedia, we do not accept images whose use is restricted to Wikipedia only. We accept freely licenced images that may be used by anyone for anything, including commercial use. Is she aware of this fact? ww2censor (talk) 17:00, 2 October 2009 (UTC)


 * ww2censor is correct. In order to use the image, we need explicit permission from the copyright holder.  I am sure what you are saying is true (about being given permission), but legally we need proof (and as noted the person who gave you permission may not actually have the legal rights to the photo).  That said, you most likely a legitimate claim to fair use assuming the image has been previously published.  See Non-free_content_criteria for further information. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:22, 3 October 2009 (UTC)