User talk:JeffreyV7

Welcome!

 * }

December 2011
Hello! I'm a bot created by another Wikipedia editor. I wanted to let you know that I removed a link that you recently added to the page Essiac here. I did this because http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0ibsoqjPac is probably inappropriate for an encyclopedia. We generally try to avoid linking to external audio or video. We appreciate your help in making Wikipedia better for everyone. If I made a mistake, feel free to undo my edit. If you have any questions, you can ask at the Help desk. Thank you! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:00, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Essiac. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --jpgordon:==( o ) 21:17, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Edit-warring
Your recent editing history at essiac shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. MastCell Talk 21:27, 1 December 2011 (UTC)