User talk:Jeffrey Henning

Nomination of Baza Radikaro Oficiala for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baza Radikaro Oficiala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Baza Radikaro Oficiala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:26, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

About translating
Hi! I saw your question at the AFD. AFD is for discussing the article and whether it should be deleted, so I am replying here, in case it turns into a conversation. One of the first things I did on Wikipedia, more than two years ago, was translate an article from the Nepali Wikipedia. It turned out to be spam from a notorious abuser; I was lucky to not get blocked right there. My translation was speedy deleted per WP:G11. I don't think I've translated anything since. Some other Wikipedias are not as bad as Nepali Wikipedia but none are as strict and well-patrolled as English. So, it could be that articles that are accepted elsewhere won't be acceptable here at all. It is up to you to still make sure that the topic you choose to translate is notable by English Wikipedia's standards, that the content in the article is accurate and references are real, work and verify what they are cited for.I came across this article during my WP:NPP run. I noticed it did not cite any independent sources, and a quick google search didn't give me any. That is why I nominated it for deletion. That's what NPP is; you have to decide between approving an article and nominating it for deletion. Just because I could not find it does not mean there may not be. But it is the responsibility of those who think the article should be kept to make their case. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:06, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Atari BASIC note
About a year ago you added a mention of Data General BASIC being integer only. This is definitely NOT the case, DG's own manual details the floating-point format. This doesn't mean there wasn't an int-only DG basic, but not "Data General BASIC" in any case. Can you post the relevant quotes from the book? Google Books doesn't have snippet view. Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Fan of your work, Maury! I pulled out the book. It's Data General Business Basic, which is integer only. Hope that added detail helps! --Jeffrey Henning (talk) 15:19, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Columbia Games Crusader Rex Saladin block.png
Thanks for uploading File:Columbia Games Crusader Rex Saladin block.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 13:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of King of Wales for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article King of Wales is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/King of Wales until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 00:05, 30 November 2023 (UTC)