User talk:Jeffrey Lyons

July 2011
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ben Lyons, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ''What you call "jealous bloggers" are legitimate sources and widespread criticism that belongs in the article. If you have a problem with the way the information is written, bring it up on the article's talk page rather than repeatedly vandalizing the article itself. Moreover, you have a clear conflict of interest, which means you should recuse yourself from the debate entirely.'' Rwiggum  (Talk /Contrib ) 05:47, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ben Lyons, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. &Dagger; M A HE W A &Dagger;  &bull;   talk  01:03, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism of Ben Lyons
It isn't up to you to decide who should define a Wikipedia biography. The sources you removed met Wikipedia's guidelines for third-party sources. It doesn't matter if you call them "jealous bloggers," those sources came from the New York Daily News, Entertainment Weekly and Los Angeles Times, and represent real coverage of actual criticism of the subject. What's more, you have a serious conflict of interest that restricts you from making the type of nonconstructive edits you have been making. Please stop. Rwiggum (Talk /Contrib ) 05:33, 7 July 2011 (UTC)