User talk:Jeffrey Montano/sandbox

Sebastian's Peer Review
I think the lead section is strong and easily understandable. If you feel it's relevant, include some of the more famous examples of process engineering that people might know about here so that the readers have a better idea of where process engineering might be present in their lives. The structure seems easy to follow so far. I would try to combine the sections about the history of process engineering and process systems engineering since they seem to have a similar idea. I would also add some space between the "See also", "References", and "External links" sections since they looked a little cramped. The balance of the article is good so far. The overview is long enough that I feel I get enough detail about the topic, the areas of focus have links to pages where I can learn about those topics, and there is a good bit of history to read about for process engineering. The tone of the article is neutral and all the sources come from reliable articles.

Response to Sebastian's Peer Review
Thank you, I added the cosmetic changes you suggested. I also removed the "process systems engineering and i didn't feel they need to be integrated and this page is about process engineering not process systems engineering. I have yet to add specific processes as I am working on a section that breaks down specific aspects of process engineering that should suffice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffrey Montano (talk • contribs) 22:38, 1 March 2019 (UTC)