User talk:Jeffreygreenberg

A tag has been placed on Jeffrey Greenberg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Finngall  talk  22:42, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Jeffreygreenberg! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:35, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Jeffrey Greenberg -

Articles for deletion nomination of Jeffrey Greenberg
I have nominated Jeffrey Greenberg, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Greenberg. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Decker (talk) 02:36, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

undeleting article
It is possible to undelete an article, but I can't do it, you'll need to request the assistance of an administrator such as the one who closed the deletion debate, her or his talk page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cirt

In terms of making the arguments for undeletion, you'll want to frame those arguments in terms of the relevant wikipedia policies on sourcing, verifiability and notability. Those policies are found in the following three sections and under links therein: WP:RS, WP:V, and WP:N. In general you'll need to present multiple, reliable secondary sources that are independent of the person being written about (e.g., newspapers, books authored by other people, but not blogs (not reliable), autobiographies, corporate bios (not independent), encyclopedias (not secondary), etc. ). Best of luck! --Joe Decker (talk) 15:17, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Also note: "scanned in" implies non-published sources, which fail our requirement for verifiability. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:09, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Conflict of interest, at article Jeffrey Greenberg
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jeffrey Greenberg, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 21:39, 1 July 2010 (UTC)