User talk:Jeg4all

February 2010
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ibukun Jegede, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:48, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, I'm Alex Cohn. I noticed that in this edit to Ibukun Jegede, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 02:02, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Paid editing disclosure required
Hello Jeg4all. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Ibukun Jegede, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jeg4all. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS (talk |c|em ) 04:39, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Re: to your email
Please follow the instructions given at WP:COIEDIT. GSS (talk |c|em ) 07:09, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I strongly suggest you use the article's talk page to request changes to the article because of your conflict of interest. Please see Template:Request edit for more. GSS (talk |c|em ) 08:29, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Jeg4all. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Ibukun Jegede, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 09:47, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Ibukun Jegede for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ibukun Jegede is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ibukun Jegede until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 13:42, 3 November 2018 (UTC)