User talk:Jegannarth

Almost everywhere I go, I see 'No Smoking' signs. Especially in and around school and hospital compounds. Yet in these same smoking prohibited areas, cars are parked with their engines running, so the heater or air-con can continue working, according to weather conditions. One needs no further proof that an individual can commit suicide inhaling exhaust fumes within hours. Similar attempt through smoking tobacco, even for months and years will not bring about such result. It validates the fact, that exhaust fumes are thousands of times more dangerous to health than tobacco smoke. Albeit, even among educated communities, who I suppose should be able to reason better, most people appear to fear tobacco smoke more than exhaust fumes as they jog around bumper to bumper traffic in big cities.

Advertisement for tobacco smoking is banned on television most everywhere, especially in Australia. Yet I have watched on several occasions an advertiser claiming, that the can of insecticide spray mounted on the wall of a family home, which would spray automatically every hour or so, is not harmful to the children or adults occupants. In view of what Health Science has taught me, I find this advertisement on TV impossible to swallow. Anyone out there who could convince me otherwise? Have any health scientist watched this ad and agreed to it!

Quite recently, the good side of science acknowledged how the prescription drug Oxycontin has killed more people than 'heroine' the prohibited drug. Yet, I know of no attempts made to stop such prescription.

Most of us have heard the saying, 'Making mountain out of a mole hill'. It is my strong opinion, that all the fuss made about smoking tobacco, actually works to block out the dangers of other more hazardous items. Please consider this example. Say someone died drinking a full glass of full cream milk which was mixed with one drop of poison. Should the conclusion be that the individual died due to drinking a glass of full cream milk! Similarly, in a tailor made cigarette, a smoker does not only smoke tobacco. That pertains mainly to things like cigars or pipes. Cigarettes are said to contain some twelve added ingredients for various reasons. In my opinion the worst item is the filter in cigarettes. This fine fibered synthetic filter is capable of releasing very toxic fumes, similar to that of burning carpets and plastics.when hot burning tobacco is closest to it. Toxic fumes which can harm body organs very much faster than than an healthy body can repair itself. While this filter in cigarettes was insisted upon decades ago by some medical experts with a sincere view of reducing nicotine and tar intake, it nevertheless is a very bad addition to a not so good habit of smoking. Apart from being a very toxic addition, this filter also poses as one of the most ugliest of all pollutions on the surface of earth, whereon, billions of filters are strewn all over on a daily basis. All these adverse effects due to one wrong assessment by a small party of experts. Under these circumstances, blaming only tobacco for all smoking related illnesses, simply cannot be right. At the latest count, and now at almost 64yrs. of age, I've smoked over 985,000 mostly rollies without filters. From main stream scientific point of view, I should probably be very ill or dead by now. Thank God, to date I've not been affected by any life threatening smoking related illness, nor diagnosed as a diabetic or as suffering blood pressure. This is so, while several of my friends and relatives, including non smokers, continuously seek medical attention for various illnesses; some of which are life threatening.

I have a purpose for this 'talk page'. It is mainly to make at least some people realize how 'true health logic' works. It is wrong to believe that simple things like sugar, salt, milk, fat etc., are bad for you. True health logic dictates, that when the body fails to assimilate such simple foods, it's a warning that the body has reached a 'bad' state of health, and not that these foods are 'bad'. Excellent health can be procured through happiness combined with activities as the two main steps. As happiness is the state of mind, for excellent health, how one thinks, is much more important than what one eats and drinks! More facts on this subject can be shared at a later date if anyone deems it worthwhile. For now though, I would like to thank many very helpful Scientific acknowledgements and various cultural and religious studies which have combined to give me some unique insights into true health logic. Thus enabling me so far to live a enjoyable life without fearing as millions seem to.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jegannarth/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Jegannarth Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sam_Sailor&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Jegannarth reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam Sing! 18:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)