User talk:Jehmbo

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/FixerFixerFixer. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The SandDoctor Talk 20:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

I suppose I can understand that, though it assumes a lot of conspiracy. However those links were shared in the spirit of "and the cherry on top is..." The primary portion of my request is providing non-sock puppet reasons for the "behavioral" evidence against me. I'm sorry, but this decline is cherry picking.

What do you intend to edit about if unblock? Do you intend to write about Zak Smith or maybe something else?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  01:19, 8 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I would probably focus more on my other screenplay related topics of research— Greek Tragic Drama, Heian Era Japan, Early Internet Pornography. As for Zak Smith’s page I’d have to see the COI resolved before I felt comfortable enough to touch it. Jehmbo (talk) 01:26, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Would you accept a wp:topic ban on the topic of Zak Smith, wp:broadly construed, if unblocked?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:15, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry for not responding - this has been kind of a frustrating introduction to editing on the website - I took a break.
 * I don't understand - why should I broadly avoid an extremely niche page when it is one of the few topics I know about and it is clear I'm not there to disrupt it - I want to fix errors.
 * I hadn't even made an edit yet - because it was so clear from the messy record of errors that people with notifications on watching it would accuse me of being a sockpuppet if they were contradicted. All I did was share readily-available proof that one of them bore the subject a grudge. The COI investigation, as a result of this block - instigated by the person with the COI no less - was ignored and has since been archived:
 * [Https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Conflict+of+interest/Noticeboard&oldid=prev&diff=1136399785 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard&oldid=prev&diff=1136399785]
 * I feel like I'm being tested and I'm not sure if it is appropriate to do so. If I refuse the ban, then I must be a sockpuppet. But if I say yes, nothing is meaningfully adjudicated.
 * I would consider a ban on the topic of MorbidThoughts' COI. But you must see this page is central to what I research in such a way that there's not much point to me editing at all if I can't do anything to bring it up to a professional standard. Jehmbo (talk) 22:14, 26 November 2023 (UTC)