User talk:Jejeki

Speedy deletion nomination of Juiceslf (Nigerian musician)
Hello Jejeki,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Juiceslf (Nigerian musician) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nagol0929 (talk) 13:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juiceslf (Nigerian rapper) (June 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juiceslf (Nigerian rapper) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Juiceslf_(Nigerian_rapper) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Greenman&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Juiceslf_(Nigerian_rapper) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 15:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Orphan tags
Please don't remove maintenance tags, like you did at Shallipopi in this edit, if the problems raised haven't been fixed. If you need help, you can ask at the Teahouse, a friendly forum for new users. Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 12:45, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

 * Subject: Appeal regarding Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ijumdiya wadzani

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to request the unblocking of my Wikipedia account, which has been erroneously associated with the sock puppet account "Ijumdiya wadzani" in the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ijumdiya wadzani case. I want to emphasize that I have no involvement whatsoever in the creation or use of the aforementioned sock puppet account.

As an avid contributor and supporter of Wikipedia's mission, I have always adhered to its policies and guidelines diligently. Throughout my tenure on Wikipedia, I have made substantial contributions to various articles and discussions, focusing primarily on Apple Industrial Design Group, Coco lee, Shallipopi, Kiriku, Mr Funny etc. My commitment to upholding the principles of neutrality, accuracy, and ethical editing has been unwavering.

It has come to my attention that I have been blocked due to the alleged association with the sock puppet account. I can assure you that this is an incorrect assumption and a case of mistaken identity. I cannot stress enough my innocence in these allegations.

I am fully aware of the seriousness of sock puppetry and understand why the community takes such actions seriously. I firmly believe in the integrity and honesty of the Wikipedia platform. I am devoted to supporting its growth and maintaining the highest standards for trustworthy content. Therefore, it is essential to address and resolve this misunderstanding promptly so that I can resume my contributions.

I kindly request that you thoroughly investigate this matter to ascertain my complete lack of involvement in the sock puppet account. I offer my full cooperation and am prepared to provide any additional information or evidence that may be necessary to establish my innocence beyond any doubt.

Being blocked over such allegations has been disheartening, but I remain optimistic that through this appeal, the truth will prevail. I request your reconsideration of the block on my account, allowing me to continue my contributions and uphold the values of transparency, collaboration, and reliability within the Wikipedia community.

Thank you for your attention and understanding. I eagerly await a positive resolution to rectify this misunderstanding and enable me to contribute to Wikipedia once again.

Sincerely,


 * Jehu Matthew

Jejeki (talk) 00:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, Jejeki,
 * I'm not a checkuser so I can't unblock you, and you actually haven't posted an unblock request, but I'd just like to ask you what led you to try to create an article on Juiceslf? Because most of this sockmaster's sockpuppets have done exactly that. In fact, I'm sure that's what got you reported to SPI in the first place. Do you have an explanation for that? Are you being compensated for writing this article? Thank you for any information you can provide. Liz Read! Talk! 03:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Clarifying Intention: Creating an Article on Juiceslf without Sockpuppet Involvement: Thank you for reaching out to discuss my attempt to create an article on Juiceslf. I understand your concerns about potential connections to sockpuppet accounts. I want to assure you that I have no knowledge or involvement with any sockpuppet accounts or their activities.

The reason I wanted to create an article on Juiceslf is simply because I'm genuinely interested in the music and artistry of this individual. I find their talent and creativity inspiring, and I believe they deserve recognition within the Wikipedia community.

To answer your question about compensation, I want to clarify that I am not being compensated in any way for writing this article. I have no personal or financial gain from creating content on Juiceslf.

I apologize if my actions seem similar to those of sockpuppets in the past, but I assure you that it is purely coincidental. I am just an enthusiastic editor who wants to contribute positively to the Wikipedia community.

If there is any additional information I can provide or any steps I can take to address this misunderstanding, please let me know. I value transparency and ethical editing practices, and I am committed to working with you to resolve this matter.

Thank you for your understanding and support.


 * please can you lead me through, because am new here. Jejeki (talk) 07:05, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Jejeki (talk) 07:13, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Read the information in the block notice box. All the help you need is there. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:40, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Note that my decline was solely based on the ✅ connection to, which Jejeki appeared to be denying ("I have had no involvement or connection whatsoever with the mentioned sock puppet account"). I did not deeply dive into the connection with the original sockmaster and I see that Jejeki did indeed previously disclose the connection to Savemoon. --Yamla (talk) 12:00, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Yamla (talk)
 * Subject: Clarification of Ownership and Connection with "savemoon" Account

I would like to address the recent discussion regarding my alleged connection with the "savemoon" account. I want to clarify that I have never denied, nor will I ever deny my connection with the "savemoon" account based on what I said above is that I have never created multiple accounts for violation, but I created them to improve Wikipedia. In fact, I want to provide a full disclaimer that I am the owner of both accounts and acknowledge my responsibility for their actions.

While it is true that I disclosed my ownership of both accounts during their creation, I would like to emphasize that neither account has been involved in any disruptive or malicious editing. I have always strived to abide by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the information I contribute.

In light of the evidence presented, I kindly request specific details or examples of any alleged disruptive activities that have been associated with either account. I am committed to upholding the standards set by Wikipedia, and I am dedicated to rectifying any mistakes made.

I assure you that I have the utmost respect for Wikipedia as a community-driven platform and the efforts made by its administrators to maintain its integrity. I am truly grateful for the opportunity to contribute positively to the platform and to learn from experienced editors like yourself.Thank you for your understanding and for considering my appeal. I look forward to resolving this matter in a fair and transparent manner. - Jejeki (talk) 01:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)


 * User was ✅ to the original sockmaster at Sockpuppet investigations/Ijumdiya wadzani. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:03, 14 July 2023 (UTC)