User talk:Jekhai Narzary

Hello Ronjoy Brahma

Proposed deletion of Ronjoy Brahma


The article Ronjoy Brahma has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  Dewritech (talk)  17:47, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ronjoy Brahma


Hello. A tag has been placed on Ronjoy Brahma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  02:10, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Stop creating articles until you understand the guidelines
Hello, I have noticed that you are creating a lot of articles on Wikipedia. However, most of the articles are of poor quality, consisting of only one sentence with no references. Moreover, most of the topics you have written about are not significant enough to be included in a general encyclopedia. I suggest that you read this guide thoroughly before continuing creating articles, and using the article wizard to create drafts instead of articles, so that they can be reviewed first. Thank you. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 02:30, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bathing of Cattle


The article Bathing of Cattle has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable poem.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 03:39, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Ishan Mushahary
He was a Bodo language poet.

Jaolia Dewan
The article Jaolia Dewan has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article was about a real person or group of people, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or an organized event, but did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is actually significant enough for an encyclopedia article, you are free to re-create it, but this time you need to demonstrate that, which is best done by citing to reliable, secondary sources that are entirely unconnected to the topic.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:24, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Amteka
The article Amteka has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article was about a real person or group of people, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or an organized event, but did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is actually significant enough for an encyclopedia article, you are free to re-create it, but this time you need to demonstrate that, which is best done by citing to reliable, secondary sources that are entirely unconnected to the topic.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:26, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of My Little Village


The article My Little Village has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable poem.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Jekhai Narzary, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220  of  Borg 09:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of "Ishan Mushahary"
Ishan Mushahary, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. David. moreno 72   10:02, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Www.poemhunter.com


Hello. A tag has been placed on Www.poemhunter.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AllyD (talk) 10:18, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 220  of  Borg 10:42, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Off to a bad start
Jekhai, you appear to be off to a bad start. You appear to be here to provide content about literature and media in the Bodo language, and that's super. The wider Wikipedia's coverage, the better! But, you appear to be creating articles that don't meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion. As important as it is for us to increase our coverage of little-known topics, such as the Bodo culture, we can only do so based on material that is backed by reliable sources, and none of the material you've introduced can make that claim. You've created an article about Ronjoy Brahma, and it got deleted. Before you continue to create articles about all of his works (which will also be deleted, because there is nothing to indicate that these are notable poems), you should concentrate on trying to write a better article about Brahma himself. As a poet of the Bodo language, he may well be a notable person, but you'll need to find evidence of that based on other people having written about him in published sources (books, magazines, reliable websites, etc.) Once you can demonstrate that Brahma is a notable poet, than you can list his poems on the page about him. For any given poem, unless there has been some significant analysis or criticism of the poem published, the poem probably does not deserve its own article. And we would never publish the text of a poem written by a living poet, as that would violate the poet's copyrights. I hope this message, as well as the links in the welcome message above, will help you as you create what appears to be much-needed content about the Bodo culture. Good luck! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * PS: On Talk:Ronjoy Brahma, you asked "how can I create a reference". Please see Citing sources for information on how to do that. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:35, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of My Little Village


A tag has been placed on My Little Village requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

non notable poem, possible copyright violation

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dilip Basumatary


Hello. A tag has been placed on Dilip Basumatary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:55, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 17:41, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Bathing of Cattle for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bathing of Cattle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bathing of Cattle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red dogsix (talk) 20:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of My Little Village for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Little Village is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/My Little Village until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 01:28, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rangina Sangina


The article Rangina Sangina has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No evidence that this poem is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 06:46, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Jekhai Narzary. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 07:07, 10 September 2016 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 12:37, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Bodo-language films for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Bodo-language films is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Bodo-language films until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sandstein  22:38, 18 January 2018 (UTC)