User talk:Jellypear

Hello, Jellypear, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. If you have not used any other accounts please disregard this notice. Thanks, a13ean (talk) 19:47, 2 January 2013 (UTC)


 * "Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia." I have only made one minor edit which accurately clarified that a MA paper was not a PhD dissertation. I don't know why such a minor edit would suggest that I am using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. For the record this is my first and only Wikipedia account and I have never discussed wikipedia edits with anyone. To my knowledge, no one that I know even has a wikipedia account.Jellypear (talk) 21:21, 2 January 2013 (UTC)


 * It's a long story, but the timing of your appearance into this specific content area raised some red flags with regard to an IP which was just blocked as a sock of someone named PeteK. However, since you're apparently not them, please accept my apology and welcome to wikipedia.  Cheers,  a13ean (talk) 21:33, 2 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you. You can imagine how I felt receiving your message after having my account for only a few hours and having made only one page edit. Jellypear (talk) 22:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Request for clarification about reliable sources for Waldorf education
I am requesting clarification of the arbitration ruling on reliable sources at Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment. You may want to add any thoughts on the subject there. hgilbert (talk) 19:30, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Amazing bit of research there
Thanks for following up the Australian study. I'm impressed by the findings. hgilbert (talk) 03:23, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Waldorf education
Hi! I note you have today reverted both my and User:Binksternet's edits to this article to get your own preferred version. In general, edit warring is not a productive way to improve an article. A much better approach is set out by WP:BRD where, in the case of disagreement, a bold edit is reverted, and then discussion continues on the Talk pacge to reach consensus. It's not a rule, but I recommend it as a good MO for article editing. Alexbrn talk 13:59, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Curriculum
Hi! In this edit you changed the WE article to mention preparation materials. Yet I thought we agreed here that they weren't clear about that in their text; so we were passing on their ambiguity without any outright misrepresentation. What's changed? Alexbrn talk 07:53, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Ullrich in the lead (Waldorf education)
Hi! Your re-reversion on this is against WP policy (please read WP:YESPOV and WP:INTEXT). I am not prepared to edit war over this so please reconsider after studying those documents. If you are not moved, please let me know and we can take this to dispute resolution. Alexbrn talk 15:21, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomas E. Matthews Community School
Please see my comments on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomas E. Matthews Community School. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  06:35, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Minor Edit
Just a note: I think you are over-using the minor edit flag. Check Help:Minor Edit. For example, I think that inserting a reference is not a minor edit, even though it doesn't change the meaning of the text. M.boli (talk) 03:52, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)