User talk:Jeltag-the-Ferret

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. -sesuPRIME talk • contribs 04:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. -sesuPRIME talk • contribs 05:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

I have reverted your edits to Animalia (TV series) as the characters you added to the list appear to be completely made up. You even stated that the characters "might appear or not". Please don't add false or made up information to Wikipedia, and if the information you are adding is true and accurate, please add a link to a reliable source as Sesu Prime suggests above. --Canley (talk) 01:24, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Dan Petronijevic has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps 23:29, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jamie Haydon-Devlin
A tag has been placed on Jamie Haydon-Devlin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Intelligent  sium  23:46, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Jamie Haydon-Devlin
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jamie Haydon-Devlin. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:27, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Dan Petronijevic
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Dan Petronijevic. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:27, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dan Petronijevic
A tag has been placed on Dan Petronijevic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Intelligent  sium  02:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Edit to Jim Cummings
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Cactusjump (talk) 19:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Gil Filar
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Gil Filar. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Dan Kuenster
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Dan Kuenster. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Category:Criminals
Labelling the thousands of people in the category as "villains" is plainly inappropriate. Please do not repeat your edit. Steve Smith (talk) 23:52, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Joris Jarsky
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Joris Jarsky. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Trivialist (talk) 18:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

George Arthur Bloom
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: George Arthur Bloom. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Joris Jarsky
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Joris Jarsky. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Joris Jarsky. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tom Kenney
A tag has been placed on Tom Kenney requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Singularity42 (talk) 20:45, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

J.A.C Redford
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: J.A.C Redford. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Former colonies for Minnesota cities?
Could you please explain why you classified Belle Plaine, Minnesota and Lakeville, Minnesota into Category:Former French colonies? Also, why did you categorize Fridley, Minnesota and Plymouth, Minnesota into Category:Former British colonies? Belle Plaine, Lakeville, Fridley, and Plymouth hadn't been established at the time the territory was under British or French possession, so it's inaccurate to classify them as colonies. Moreover, those four cities weren't individually held as colonies. In any case, there's already a category, Category:Former colonies of France

As far as classifying Minnesota as a former British colony, that's also debatable, since Minnesota hadn't been founded yet when the British owned the eastern section of the state -- it was part of the Indian Reserve (1763) and later part of the Northwest Territory. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 20:56, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Belle Plaine, Minnesota. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lakeville, Minnesota. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Fridley, Minnesota. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Plymouth, Minnesota. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Group29 (talk) 23:53, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Jeltag-the-Ferret! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) J. A. C. Redford -
 * 2) George Arthur Bloom -
 * 3) Dan Kuenster -
 * 4) Michael Haigney -
 * 5) Tyrone Savage -

Proposed deletion of Michael Haigney


The article Michael Haigney has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. JJ98 (Talk) 18:46, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kathy Borland


The article Kathy Borland has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Lack of notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Nomination of Gil Filar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gil Filar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gil Filar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. gnu 57 02:22, 31 March 2023 (UTC)