User talk:Jem315/Evaluate an Article

Paleoethnobotany

This article was fairly methods heavy but didn't include any examples of situations where these methods were applied. There is also some information missing about the origins of the practice, its history, as well as justification of the methods and theories used. There is also only a mainstream perspective shared, but paleoethnobotany should include more information for a variety of perspectives. The article was well-cited, but in the beginning, the page mentions disagreements amongst researchers but doesn't elaborate on the problems within the discipline. The links for the sources work.

(Jem315 (talk) 11:07, 6 July 2020 (UTC))