User talk:Jemesouviens32

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Dore
Hi. Would you take a moment to read my comments there? Thanks. Moonraker2 (talk) 00:03, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Luck
What do you think of making a page for "Lucky Symbols"? Luck Talk page Captwheeler (talk) 00:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Peter Devlin
Have you made a mistake in nominating the article on Peter Devlin for deletion? You user page says you never take such action. Dormskirk (talk) 20:36, 3 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Am not convinced that Peter Devlin is at all notable, perhaps when he is promoted to CDS he will be worthy of a mention, I do not see that at this time, seeing your many honorable military related contributions, Devlin is the only one not a being four star equivalent coincidentally, also, the least notable.--Jemesouviens32 (talk) 20:45, 3 July 2010 (UTC)


 * To say he is the least notable is highly subjective. After all he had combat experience in Bosnia. With respect please can we all work together to improve and expand articles (as suggested on your user page) rather than deleting them? Dormskirk (talk) 20:51, 3 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Sorry, in blatant cases such as this, I feel that the AfD is justified, others will chime in and perhaps his article will stand.--Jemesouviens32 (talk) 20:56, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you please add your objections to the Afd page for the article? It would help to clear up some questions we all have as to your judgment on nominating for deletion.  Mr. R00t    Talk  21:51, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Please could we now bring this debate to a conclusion: there is 1 vote in favour of deletion (yours) and 8 against. There is also a request (not from me) that you take a look at WP:BEFORE. The only reason why the debate has not been concluded is that you have so far chosen not to withdraw your nomination despite Wikipedia's democratic approach to these things. Thanks in anticipation Dormskirk (talk) 09:56, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Majority rules, although still believe that this Gentleman is not notable, at all, albeit will not stand in front of a wikipedian freight train. Please proceed as you see fit.Jemesouviens32 (talk) 13:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * OK. Thanks. I will remove the tags Dormskirk (talk) 13:31, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Johannes Maas and Worldwide Faith Missions
I came upon your involvement in the AfD discussion on a missionary by the name of Johannes Maas (see Articles for deletion/Johannes Maas (missionary) and Articles for deletion/Johannes Maas (missionary) (2nd nomination) for the discussion). I have nominated Worldwide Faith Missions, another article which was written by the same author as the Johannes Maas article, up for AfD. Apart from the author of the Worldwide Faith Missions article and myself, there has been no response so far on its AfD page. Would you mind having a look at this AfD perhaps? You can find it here: Articles for deletion/Worldwide Faith Missions. Thank you. - Takeaway (talk) 03:37, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:A6 leopard mirror wrx.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:19, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saif Uddin


A tag has been placed on Saif Uddin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Dewritech (talk)  18:19, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

File:A6 leopard mirror wrx.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A6 leopard mirror wrx.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Yann (talk) 19:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roméo Dallaire, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Steven Silver, Chief of the Defence Staff and Arusha Accords. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)