User talk:Jemima1418

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Cerebellum (talk) 21:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Cerebellum (talk) 21:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 01:22, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Songwhale, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 02:09, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  D u s t i *poke* 13:49, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Royalty, Etc. Records concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Royalty, Etc. Records, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:10, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ty Morse has been accepted
 Ty Morse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Jemima1418 help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Unspecified source/license for File:Ty pic 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ty pic 2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 18:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Royalty, Etc. Records concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Royalty, Etc. Records, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Royalty, Etc. Records


Hello Jemima1418. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Royalty, Etc. Records".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 20:17, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Ty Morse Songwhale.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ty Morse Songwhale.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 10:39, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

PAID EDITING
Hello. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly and you seem to have abided by that.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to mandatorily disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose (in the form of ).

If I am mistaken and you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure.

In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Winged Blades Godric 06:38, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

I am not being paid to write or edit anything on wikipedia. Not sure what gave you that impression. I review the pages that I have created to make sure they are correct, and reported an inappropriate and disrespectful edit to one of the pages I was the originator of. Thank you for your reminders about paid editing, but that information is not applicable to me.Jemima1418 (talk) 17:52, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Ty Morse for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ty Morse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ty Morse until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Winged Blades Godric 07:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Stick At it
Dear Jemima1418, stick at it. My first article was deleted, and it hard to take, after so much work. Stick around.scope_creep (talk) 08:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!


Hello, Jemima1418, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to continue. Some useful pages to visit are:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. We're so glad you're here! 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎)

Your request to work on Ty Morse
Hi. You requested "userfication" of this article on my talk page back in January. I'm sorry, but I was on an extended break for Wikipedia due to RL demands, and only saw the request now. I'm willing to do this for you, but it looks like you haven't been on Wikipedia for a couple of months either. I don't want to bring this back if no one is going to work on it, so here's what I'll do. If you come back, and still would like to work on the article, just post on my talk page again (click on the "So let it be written" in my signature) and I'll pop it back on for you. I'm monitoring the page, so even if I haven't posted in a bit I should still an email about your post. All the best. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  15:00, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ty Morse (April 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ty Morse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ty Morse, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ty_Morse Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shadowowl&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ty_Morse reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

&raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  13:30, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ty Morse has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ty Morse. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 20:17, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ty Morse has been accepted
 Ty Morse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! ToThAc (talk) 14:11, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Ty_Morse help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Unblock Request

 * for update on this. - Penwhale &#124; dance in the air and follow his steps 00:08, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Hmm? Says right in the block log who this account belongs to. Courcelles (talk) 00:35, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Courcelles, I am confused. The block log indicates that my account belongs to someone else? I am a real person who has only operated on wikipedia under my own user name: jemima1418. I am a novice wikipedia editor, which is probably pretty obvious from my lack of skill in these behind-the-scenes communications. What exactly have I done--jemima1418--that is worthy of being blocked? Penwhale, can you offer any help here? Jemima1418 (talk) 16:45, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * See my decline reason above. - Penwhale &#124; dance in the air and follow his steps 22:15, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Penwhale! I will write to the Arbitration Committee and ask for their help. Could you possibly direct me to the resources that explain why one of my articles, which went through the Articles of Creation process in May and was accepted, was deleted when I was blocked? I'm having a hard time understanding why the article is being affected by my block, since it was reviewed and approved by other editors. Jemima1418 (talk) 00:17, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Assuming you meant Ty Morse, the article was deleted because you are accused of having operated another account (Sundartripathi) that is current blocked; one of the criteria of something being speedily deleted is creations by banned or blocked users. The other reason for the deletion should no longer apply (the AFD it cites happened back in January and like you said AFC came after.) - Penwhale &#124; dance in the air and follow his steps 09:31, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for explaining, Penwhale, but I still don't quite understand. According to creations by banned or blocked users, the article must have been created when the user was banned or blocked, but I was blocked *after* the article was accepted. Furthermore, I created the original article in 2012, far before my block and the strange accusation that I am connected to this other user. I am not Sundartripathi, have no knowledge of who that is, why they were banned, or what possible connection I could have to that user. Presuming that I am unblocked, will the article be undeleted? What is the process for that happening? I really appreciate your responses, as this whole situation is way over my head. Jemima1418 (talk) 19:08, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Timing is certainly awkward, looking at the contribution (the person you're accused of being - Sundartripathi - was blocked on April 16 after the article was restarted by you on April 13, so G5 shouldn't apply). In any case, assuming that you are unblocked, you can then ask for deletion review on the grounds of (1) G5 shouldn't apply as you're not Sundartripathi, and (2) the AfD happened on a previous version and therefore should not be used as a reason to delete the updated version of the article. - Penwhale &#124; dance in the air and follow his steps 23:36, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Penwhale, thank you so much for answering my questions and having this discussion. I really appreciate it! Hopefully, the situation will be resolved soon. One last question, could anyone else ask for a deletion review of that article? Jemima1418 (talk) 17:44, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * In theory, yes. I have not looked at the state of the article prior to its deletion, so I have not judged the actual merit of it, but if you manage to clear your name, then arguments that I mentioned above are more supportive. - Penwhale &#124; dance in the air and follow his steps 22:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello Admins, I'm still waiting for a response to my unblock request. I'd like to return to being an upstanding contributor to wikipedia and am hopeful that this problem can be fixed. I've looked into the WP:Check, and am under the impression that there may be a concern about my IP address. I do travel and work from many different locations, but a review should show consistent access from my home in Colorado and in Illinois before that. I also continue to be concerned that an article I submitted through Articles for Creation Ty Morse was deleted for the reason that it was created by a blocked user *before* my account was blocked. Any help with these situations would be appreciated.