User talk:Jemlef

Welcome!
Hello, Jemlef, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Development of the New Testament canon does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! tgeorgescu (talk) 18:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello tgeorgescumy
 * Thank you for messaging me.
 * I dispute your suggestion that my edit was not from a neutral point of view. If I recall correctly, I amended "however, many modern scholars recognize that the New Testament texts were not written by apostles." That is a highly contentious opinion that someone has smuggled in there, and there are at least as many scholars who "recognize" that indeed they were written by apostles.
 * I believe my correction was to delete "recognize" and replace it with something like "suggest." I don't see how the original can be characterised as a NPOV, and my edit as *not* being neutral. It's hardly as if I inserted something like "falsely assert," or anything like that.
 * I request that "recognise" be deleted and a more neutral word or phrase be inserted, to preserve the NPOV of Wikipedia against biased assertions by people pushing particular agendas. I'd be happy with "believe," but I can't let "recognize" stand without protest.
 * Thank you
 * Jemlef Jemlef (talk) 12:00, 16 May 2023 (UTC)