User talk:Jen0810

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Widr (talk) 15:18, 15 September 2016 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 15:37, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

globally renamed Air Force FCU to Jen0810 and unblock discussion
globally renamed Air Force FCU to Jen0810.

Please read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. It may be that you will not be allowed to edit about your credit union. I leave it to other admins to review your edits and decide. Be prepared to tell us what constructive edits you would make to the other 5 million articles on Wikipedia. If your only purpose in being here is to edit about this credit union, I doubt you will be unblocked. You can suggest edits though. Please bear in mind that all content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking. Content from a subject's web page is generally unhelpful. Such are generally written in a promotional tone and are not independent of the subject.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 22:00, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Brand page. That just poked me in the eye. Please bear in mind that it is an encyclopedia article and not a "brand page". That sort of terminology sticks in our craw. -- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 22:02, 12 October 2018 (UTC)