User talk:Jendytor

July 2022
Hello, I'm Scope creep. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Celestica have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  scope_creep Talk  21:47, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello Jendytor. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Celestica, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jendytor. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.  scope_creep Talk  21:47, 12 July 2022 (UTC)


 * I am not compensated for the edits. Jendytor (talk) 21:53, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Am I allowed to continue editing again? Or do I need to wait for anything else? Jendytor (talk) 16:36, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Yes, that is fine. Sorry for the delay.    scope_creep Talk  18:30, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Please don't add product lists referenced to company websites. Its promotional.    scope_creep Talk  18:32, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I looked at Jabil's page and it had this kind of information so I thought it was deemed as explanatory and not promotional. As a Canadian it's a company I am passionate about as it's contributed to innovation in the country. Jendytor (talk) 20:38, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Press-releases
Hi, can you stop using press-releases to source your article. The content you added to Celestica was all press-releases which makes them unreliable. Wikipedia is not a webhost or forum or a social media site when any old junk can be posted.  scope_creep Talk  20:13, 28 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Even when it's a publicly traded company? It's managed 3rd party. Can you provide guidance then?  99.228.218.33 (talk) 13:04, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I added the 2021 financials based on their press release and thos were rejected and on previous edits I used their website and was told not to do that either. How would you update those if both sources are unreliable?   99.228.218.33 (talk) 13:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)