User talk:Jengod/Archive 13

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12

Alex Padilla
Gosh, this page is so clean I hate to mess it up. What's the story with Alex Padilla? It looks to me like someone is trying to fill it with negative info. Listing the endorsements that he didn't get seems odd, and using blogs as sources is generally avoided. But I noticed you restored all of that. Was there a reason that I am missing? Cheers, -Will Beback 19:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure that keeping the negative assertions is a good solution, especially those that use non-reliable sources. I personally think it is better to say too little than too much. I'll take a closer look at it next week. Cheers, -Will Beback 19:16, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Californiapostcard.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Californiapostcard.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 06:01, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

DYK

 * p.s. You may just want to have a look at the history of Template:Did you know just before and after the current updation. --Gurubrahma 05:45, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Nbcradiocitylosangeles1930s.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nbcradiocitylosangeles1930s.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stan 06:38, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Airport-us-grr-vintagepostcard.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Airport-us-grr-vintagepostcard.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. SteinbDJ 17:20, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the compliment; it really means a lot. By the way, it was from your list I was working. Fay2 00:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:California Map MINI nonames.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:California Map MINI nonames.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 22:27, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Thessaloniki on the Article Improvement Drive == ==

Hey! I noticed your work on and interst in Thessaloniki and wanted to let you know that I nominated the city's article for the Article Improvement Drive. It is very close to reaching Featured Article Status and it deserves that recognition. Please feel free to vote for its candidacy at the AID! --Caponer 01:16, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Socalareacodes
I convert the Gif to a Png here: Image:Socalareacodes.PNG. Does this look any better? Rmhermen 15:40, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

History of California
I noticed that user:GeorgeLouis did a major "trimming" of History of California. It was too long, IMO, and I'm glad someone did. His edits appeared reasonable to me, but another set of eyes would be helpful to make sure we didn't lose any key points or links. Would you mind? Here's the overall diff:. Cheers, -Will Beback 02:09, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Ina Garten article
Hi! You once edited the Ina Garten entry for Wikipedia. This article is currently up for both a peer review and good article nomination. If you find the time, please stop by the peer review page and offer your input. Thanks! Air.dance 06:44, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Oregon-counties-map.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Oregon-counties-map.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The reason for the nomination is that the image is made redundant by a PNG version of the same image, uploaded by about a month earlier. 66.167.138.249 03:55, 26 March 2006 (UTC).

American people
why shouldn't American people be a subcategory of 'History of the United States'? I added it because most of the information in the people articles is historical and it helps to give a more complete perspective of American history--not just events, but the people in them also. Thanks Hmains 03:00, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Survey
I am conducting a survey on Wikipedia and would like to invite you to participate in the study. I've posted a message on wikien-l, but here is the link again in case you are not subscribed to that list-serv. Thanks a lot for your time! --Mermes 01:32, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Peer review requested for Deconstructivism
Hey there, I was wondering if you would be at all interested in peer reviewing Deconstructivism. We have got it to a stage where some criticism would be beneficial and we'd be very grateful for your input. Many thanks --Mcginnly 11:56, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Folsom.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Folsom.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:23, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Saints Wikiproject
I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints. You can sign up on the page and add the following userbox to your user page.

I also invite you to join the discussion on prayers and infoboxes here: Prayers_are_NPOV.

Thanks! --evrik 14:23, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Socalareacodes.png
This image has been listed for deletion because it has no source/licensing. I recall that it was an image you provided and I switched file formats for. Could you add the source, etc.? Rmhermen 13:18, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Socalareacodes.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Socalareacodes.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell 21:01, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Women's suffrage: Grand merging and reforms!
Hello there, your opinion is important in Women's suffrage. Please contribute. Thank you, __ Maysara 20:37, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

HPV
Hey - thanks for the good edits (and note) re: Human papillomavirus. I'm still pretty new to the Wikipedia. I was inspired to join when I discovered that my favorite virus family had nothing but a stub. (!)

What's your thinking on having the HPV16 genome map in the Taxbox? I feel like the genome map is not directly telling about taxonomy. But more importantly, I'm worried about blasting people with too much molecular biology up at the top of the page. I'm betting most people just want to know about abnormal pap smears, skin warts and the like. And they might not really connect with the genetic organization of the virus. Maybe put the PapillomavirusCapsid.jpg image in the Taxbox and move the HPV16 genome map down to a lower section?

Several non-scientist friends have opined that Papillomavirus was over-the-top technical in its first de-stubified incarnation. Hence my worry about the having the HPV16 genome map in the Taxbox. I think my brother put it that he learned a lot from Papillomavirus, but doing so involved significant struggle and clicking lots of hyperlinks. So I took the tact of corralling the hard technical stuff at the end. I also tried to simplify the language in some of the other sections. Any thoughts? I feel reluctant to pare away whole topics that had originally been covered in Human papillomavirus. Retroid 16:11, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Map ifroefell imgmap.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Map ifroefell imgmap.gif. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 23:06, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Postcard-los-angeles-harbor-freeway.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Postcard-los-angeles-harbor-freeway.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:17, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Discofeverstamp.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Discofeverstamp.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. meco 11:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Proposed Georgia Move
As a past participant in the discussion on how to handle the Georgia pages, I thought you might be interested to know that there's a new attempt to reach consensus on the matter being addressed at Talk:Georgia (country). Please come by and share your thoughts to help form a consensus. --Vengeful Cynic 03:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Posadas, Wikipedia Integration, etc...
Greetings. I came across you thanks to the edit log at Posadas. I actually was hoping you could go back & look at an attempt I made to merge in a duplicate article that had additional content. Also looking at your profile and website, I wanted your opinion on WikiProject_Integration: you appear to be non-commital to the factions, and your input as such would be welcome.

And yes, I'm guilty of the subjects-in-titles Subject matter in South Park. Have any better ways around it?

Cwolfsheep 01:00, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

List of heights of United States presidential candidates
Nicely done! —Markles 04:38, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Bricker Amendment
You were kind enough to offer comments on this article when it was a featured article candidate last December. I've completely rewritten the article and hope to re-submit it as a FAC. In the interim, I have posted it at Peer review and hope you'll offer comments at Peer review/Bricker Amendment/archive1. PedanticallySpeaking 16:55, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to the ACW Menu template
Please visit the talk pages and discuss these contributions before posting. I think you have a strong case, and feel invited to make that case on the talk page. Thanks! BusterD 05:11, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Bricker Amendment
You were kind enough to comment on the previous FAC for the Bricker Amendment. I have now proposed it as a featured article after extensive revisions and would appreciate your vote here. PedanticallySpeaking 17:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Contributions needed to article on culture
Hello Jengod - I saw your contributions to the page on abstract art. Some of its content overlaps with the nascent Culture of New York City article. It needs lots of revising and fleshing out. If you get a chance, check it out. Your contributions would be welcome. Wv235 22:36, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Academy Awards
A while ago (February 25, 2004 to be exact) you created a WikiProject. Since then, that little project has been all-but forgotten. Yesterday, however, while I was trying to figure out the exact formatting to use for the 33rd Academy Awards, I stumbled upon the project. I saw it was inactive, but I decided to tidy it up a bit. It was as if I had stumbled upon an abandoned house in the middle of the woods and pushed in the chairs. Someone else saw this and decided the WikiProject was no longer abandoned. Feeling a sense of duty, I tidied up the project, created a project template, and branded Academy Awards articles. The central problem to this is that I'm not the one who built this house -- you are. The project is coming back to life...will you join it? --Miguel Cervantes 02:37, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject name commentary
Can you comment on this Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mexican-Americans/Chicanos? Thanks --evrik 18:52, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Californiagoldrush.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Californiagoldrush.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 21:21, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Northern Los Angeles/ Central Los Angeles Articles
I would see the point in the deletion of the articles if they referred to place names like West LA or South LA, which granted, don't exist for these two, but rather they referred to regions which imply a directional outlook (north, south, west, east) NOT a place name of popular reference designated to an area. As such, the regions in question simply specify which districts are located on a north, south, west, east subsections of the city, not to specific "official" districts or administratative divisions. For example, the article northern los angeles was created as a descriptive article for group of districts that are located north of what is considered "main Los Angeles," a place name recognition that does exist, especially since these areas do not completely correspond to what people often call them as a group, "the San Fernando Valley" - some of these are actually in the Crescenta Valley as well. Nor was the article the product of "original research" as almost all of what was written in those articles can be verified by use of the Los Angeles Almanac and other sources.

--Daniel Romero Cruz 21:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

LA photo
Thanks! --Emustonen 19:23, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Time-magazine-cover-hirohito-1928.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Time-magazine-cover-hirohito-1928.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dante Alighieri | Talk 18:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

2003 Santa Fe flood
I removed your categorization, which was probably done in a hurry... since that article is about a flood in Santa Fe, Argentina. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 00:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

1964 New York World's Fair
Hi, Jengod. Regarding this edit, I think the original category of Category:1964 might actually be a better option than Category:1964 in the United States. It was, after all, a World's Fair, and while it took place in the United States, it was really an international event. Powers T 13:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
...for a good laugh regarding Quotable. Especially the next to last quote. - Bagel7 05:20, 22 September 2006 (UTC)