User talk:JeniferDeBellis

July 2024
Hello, I'm Rsjaffe. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Raj Bothra, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Rsjaffe, you actually refused ALL the new and updated content, not just "an edit" like you mention. It would be helpful to be specific about what exactly isn't up to standards and to work with me to ensure the rest of the text is, in fact, updated. Additionally, this page has several false details and grossly biased language that go against Wikipedia's rules and misrepresent the living person, Dr. Raj Bothra, who hopes to avoid legal action if these false and slanderous things are not revised. So, to speed things along, please let us know what particular items have been flagged so we can revise them and move forward with an updated version of his biographical information that accurately reflects who he is.  JeniferDeBellis (talk) 01:52, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello JeniferDeBellis. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:JeniferDeBellis. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)


 * This is not a paid endeavor. JeniferDeBellis (talk) 02:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Legal threat re: Raj Bothra. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Blocked
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. TomStar81 (Talk) 06:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC)