User talk:Jenkins.sahlin.e

Fair use rationale for File:Carr Center logo.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Carr Center logo.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 17:45, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Charlie Clements (physician)


The article Charlie Clements (physician) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 12:46, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. Big  top  みんな空の下 (トーク) 17:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gapminder foundation


A tag has been placed on Gapminder foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 23:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Rhoda Jenkins
Your articles on Rhoda Jenkins have now been deleted from Wikipedia four times - and I have removed the material you had kept on this talkpage. The material you are using for the articles is from www.acorn-online.com, and so is a copyright violation. There may be a place on Wikipedia for an article on Rhoda Jenkins, though you would need to use your own words, not copy words from an online source. And you would need to present the material on Rhoda Jenkins in such a way that demonstrates her notability, backed up with citations to reliable sources. I would suggest that you work on such an article in your user space - /Rhoda Jenkins. I would be happy to give you advice on developing such an article and to answer any questions you have. You may contact me on my talkpage.  SilkTork  *Tea time 18:28, 12 May 2011 (UTC)