User talk:Jenkins2018~

May 2018
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Coffee Party USA, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 01:50, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Coffee Party USA. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — Non-Dropframe    talk  02:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Welcome
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Coffee Party USA, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Coffee Party USA was changed by Jenkins2018~ (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879189 on 2018-05-18T02:20:38+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:20, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Your recent editing history at Coffee Party USA‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''You need to stop - your edits have been reverted by multiple editors and are basically rants at this point. If you continue, you will be reported and very probably blocked from further editing.''  Ravensfire  (talk) 02:22, 18 May 2018 (UTC)