User talk:Jennablurrs7575

Yes, IBDB is considered reliable
I saw your question about the reliability of IBDB in your summary for your edit on Richard Barthelmess. Yes, it is considered reliable. I use IBDB often when I am editing articles about actors and actresses. If you would like to see some documentation, here are some links to comments from WP's Reliable Sources Noticeboard:
 * Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 162
 * Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 111
 * Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 35

As is true with much on Wikipedia, if you look enough, you will find some editors who disagree, but I think most of us consider it to be reliable. Eddie Blick (talk) 20:55, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I very much appreciate the links and the answer to my query. I find a mixed bag with a few rules on WP and have found the most humorous articles as to when to apply or at times disregard some entirely, if conflicting...but then there is a rule to oppose such behaviour, lol. I enjoy a good Catch-22. Jennablurrs 7575  (talk) 00:30, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


 * I know just what you mean. Opinions are often diverse on here, sometimes with avid supporters on both sides I find the situation frustrating at times, because I am a person who likes to have a rule that is clear. As time goes on, I have learned to accept some level of uncertainty and do my best. If you would like to have a couple of additional links that might be useful with regard to reliability, let me first suggest Reliable sources/Perennial sources. I also have a personal page, User:Teblick/Reliable Sources that you are welcome to use if you wish. I add to it occasionally when I encounter a source that I question. If I can find an archived discussion that seems to classify the sources as reliable or unreliable, I add the source to my list with a brief comment. That way, if someone questions my removal of a source, I can point him or her to what I found. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:01, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)