User talk:JenniferOverington

December 2013
Hello, I'm Mark Arsten. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to User:JenniferProkhorov, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Responding,

Hi Mark,

Regardless of anyone's opinion or hope otherwise, I am me and I do exist prior to and without any externally imposed ideas. My real name is Jennifer Overington which I know due to me being me. Jennifer Prokhorov is a real alias I had to work with in order to extract my real life from imposed lies often presented as unbelievable ignorance and if or when caught as unbelievable ignorance in action, responded to being caught by feigning unbelievable claims of innocent intent to do anything else. Since the Jennifer Prokhorov page is an alias that was necessary to evade attempted murder, I disagree with the idea of having my real life information on the page acknowledging the public alias, and I prefer having my real life information in my real name Jennifer Overington, which is also a double identity [Sorrell] as legally required by Canada. Thus I prefer you undo your changes since I am doing my best to make the methods of genocidal mathematical cults clear to the people who, without being able to see the genocidal mathematical cults' methods, are in harm's way.

JenniferOverington (talk) 01:47, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Jennifer bus tour NA autumn 2012.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jennifer bus tour NA autumn 2012.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:54, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Jennifer 2013.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jennifer 2013.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:16, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the logistics pathways. I can make the appropriate changes during spare time in the next few days.

JenniferOverington (talk) 00:32, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:JenniferOverington


A tag has been placed on User:JenniferOverington requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Marvellous Spider-Man  05:01, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Contested deletion
Wikipedia's goals are cited as the reason for proposed deletion although a link to the summary of Wikipedia's goals is not supplied for easy reference.

I'm correcting errors in mathematics and logic. A Canadian Vancouverite fan of Wikipedia who introduced me to the project said Wikipedia is the goal of the people toward information sharing. Although some ethnicities believe in lying for phishing to drive the economy, in fact, lying for phishing causes false economies void of prosperous gain. Peaceful societies know to invest new technology, from improvements (corrections) upwards, to start industries the people can learn. Peaceful societies know the measure of a society is the science & art produced, although we're aware of those ethnicities that interrupt to fight for the sake of fighting to gleefully drain the resources of time and money while simultaneously prohibiting system corrections, prohibiting development of technology, and prohibiting computer architecture inventions from being patented.

I started correcting paradoxes, logic, while inventing technology in the late 1980s. I let people know as I'm supposed to have done. My work was stolen, I was attacked and blamed, together with many of my bright peers. Then I stopped teaching my insights to the people more professionally developed than I. For example, while correcting President Bush's fallacies [logic] during the Gulf War in 1990, I didn't write to the CIA as the CIA feels I should have done, because my professors had already robbed my peers and me that way, so I risk mitigated to live my own life instead. Living my own life and helping people, by giving advanced information in small bits, worked well until I was again attacked and blamed in 2008 for having not developed society the way I was supposed to have done, by informing my professors of corrections to paradoxes, logic, fallacies, computer architecture, physics. However, all the accusations against me are false, also, I did and do contribute intellectual property to society.

Some people debate whether the contribution is supposed to be free. It was for development. The moneyless false economy caused by phishing and by security doing risk mitigation incorrectly caused price wars. So it's fine to distribute some of the higher quality information for free.

Prior to my profile being questioned, I was starting to upload letters from Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, the British government, together with rewriting the page to focus attention on logic corrections with societal development potential, so far prohibited development because of phishing that took time.

The question isn't whether I belong in the real world in all levels, generously giving to the people for societal development together with anti-corruption. The question is whether Wikipedia's goals align with the truth.

JenniferOverington (talk) 05:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)