User talk:JenniferSkyes

Welcome!
Hi JenniferSkyes! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Nick Moyes (talk) 10:15, 9 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank You so much sir for the appreciation.
 * I will stay with the editors team and keep on working.
 * I have a question sir ..How to create a profile page of some company?
 * Waiting for your guidance
 * Regards JenniferSkyes (talk) 15:43, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Which company are you thinking of? I'm afraid we do not allow profile pages, either for people or for companies here. A userpage can be used to say a few things about one's own interests in editing Wikipedia, but not to promote oneself. Nor may a company use Wikipedia to promote itself, and only topics which meet very defined criteria of Notability are permitted. You should read WP:NCORP to understand our notability criteria for businesses. If you either work for a company, are paid by a company, or have relatives in that company, we regard you as having a Conflict of Interest which you must declare on your userpage if you intend to write about that subject. Being paid to write about something (or someone) requires an obligatory declaration to be made - advice at WP:PAID should be followed. Undeclared paid editing can end in editing rights being withdrawn I'm afraid. I hope this helps.
 * Looking at your contributions, you may find it less frustrating to make smaller edits, each one supported with a citation to a Reliable Source, rather than one huge edit. Your sandbox draft should be written based upon what good quality published sources actually say - rather than what you personally know or believe to be true. This is so that anyone, anywhere in the world, can Verify what you have added by following the source you have given. I hope this helps. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:04, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much for your guidence JenniferSkyes (talk) 07:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi!
 * I hope message finds you in good health.
 * I am an unpaid, self-paced article writer. I love to bring the infamous into the spotlight through my writings. I intend to continue writing for your distinguished organization. My ambition is to write about businesses and famous personalities. The stories of those are still unsung. Please share the guidelines and help me out in approaching my aim.
 * Thanking you in anticipation JenniferSkyes (talk) 13:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Jennifer. It's great you want to bring 'unsung personalities' into the light. Something that might interest you is a big project we have here to help fix the gender imbalance here, where far too many Wikipedia biographies are about men. It's called Women in Red, and it focusses on women who meet our Notabilty Critieria and creating articles about them. Here is one I created a couple of days ago about a Ukrainian newspaper journalist: Olga Rudenko. She featured on the cover of Time magazine earlier this month and had a detailed article about her, so meets our criteria for notability. We call it Women in Red because any link to a page about a person that hasn't yet been created will appear as a red hyperlink, not a blue one. We have a huge list of ideas of such women someone could research and try to create an article about. You can find it HERE.
 * I can't stress enough how important it is to find and support any factual statement with a good citation (reference), and the big blue 'Learn More About Editing button in my earlier welcome message should help you find all the guidance you need to get started. New articles can be started with out 'wizard' tool at the Articles for Creation page.
 * One other important thing: I won't know you've replied to me unless you include my username in that reply (unless you're actually typing a message on my own user talk page). So type an AT symbol (@) and you'll see a list of usernames once you start typing my name. Select it and continue your message. I will then get 'pinged' with a red notification alert on any page I'm editing. If you don't include my username in your reply, there's a good chance I won't know you've responded. Good luck! Nick Moyes (talk) 18:38, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Medical billing company


A tag has been placed on Medical billing company, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Owlf  📪  09:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bellmedex


A tag has been placed on Bellmedex, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRAXIDICAE💕 13:22, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello JenniferSkyes. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:JenniferSkyes. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE💕 13:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi!
 * Thank you so much for the guidelines.
 * I am working for bellmedex company as a content writer. I have not been paid specifically for wikipedia.
 * I like contributing for Wikipedia because I love writing content and to become a re-known writer in the world. Kindly, allow me to edit again.
 * Thanks and regards
 * Jennifer Skyes JenniferSkyes (talk) 07:55, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Jennifer: Because you say you work for Bellmedex, you are obviously taking a salary. If you either voluntarily choose to (or are asked to) write about that company, you are clearly being remunerated. That requires a clear disclosure on your userpage. See WP:PAID for instructions how to do this. Undisclosed paid editors are blocked so this is important.
 * I will answer your question you left on my talk page in a subsequent reply. I'll do that below, rather than on my own talk page. Nick Moyes (talk) 11:40, 18 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Regarding Bellmedex. This is a shockingly promotional article - having read your rationale for being here (and your purported skills) you should be ashamed of having written it about your employer, based upon a single TrustPilot report. Wording like "The company started with the collaboration of two brilliant minds and US-based entrepreneurs,..." is 100% WP:PROMOTION and it clearly failed to meet WP:NCORP. Its deletion was well-deserved.
 * Regarding Medical billing company: You put a wholly uncited article into mainspace, based upon not one single reference. None! We do not accept stuff that people happen to know. Ever! Nowadays we required every single sentence to be based upon already published, reliable sources. You failed completely to do that, and so it was deleted with good reason. Next time, you must not put stuff directly into mainspace, and should submit any draft for review via WP:AFC and remember that we block editors who are paid but do not declare their connection to the subject. I hope this helps you understand how we work here. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:39, 18 July 2022 (UTC)