User talk:Jenningss213

June 2019
Hello, I'm Hammersoft. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. --Hammersoft (talk) 23:04, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:33, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

In particular, you have not explained why there is any problem with the current figure of 63 deaths, or why 67 is a better number, you have not provided any source supporting your figure. &diams; J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 19:05, 25 June 2019 (UTC)