User talk:JennyKS

Speedy deletion nomination of Sustainable Wildlife Enterprises - Kangaroo


A tag has been placed on Sustainable Wildlife Enterprises - Kangaroo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pol430 talk to me 11:33, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Recreation of Sustainable Wildlife Enterprises - Kangaroo
Unfortunately, restoring deleted content directly back to where it was without receiving feedback from the deleting admin isn't likely going to earn you brownie points. I would suggest that you quickly userfy the article, work on it more, and then ask User:RHaworth if it then meets the requirements for re-inclusion, or if you feel he cannot do so without bias, you can always ask another editor. Cheers! – Ajltalk 06:33, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * In fact, I've userfied it for you. Good luck! Face-smile.svg – Ajltalk 06:55, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Also, I noticed that your username (AWS10) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, organization, or campany (Australian Wildlife Services), and may not meet Wikipedia's username policy, but as it appears you have made constructive contributions, I strongly encourage you to create a new account with a more appropriate name. However, please keep in mind that you may have a conflict of interest. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajl772 (talk • contribs)
 * That wasn't actually what I understood or had in mind when I sent you the text or I'd elaborated more. Now Richard has advised you below on what to do about your account and how to help that this topic will be covered here. --Tikiwont (talk) 11:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Block / COI
I have blocked this account for the reasons given above. You have clocked up a fair number of edits so you may wish to use the changing user name process so that your edits are still credited to you. Also I am very disappointed to see that in the course of your edits you appear to have not learned about wikilinks (as here) and are giving naked URIs - read this.

You represent Australian Wildlife Services and for that reason I am tempted to discourage you from editing because of your COI. But I will overlook that aspect. Your latest submission, now at User:AWS10/Sustainable Wildlife Enterprises - Kangaroo definitely needs re-writing. When done, I suggest you go to this AfC page and select the "submit for review" option. The proposed title should be sustainable wildlife enterprise - there is little specifically about roos, it appears to be a generic term and we prefer the singular. &mdash; RHaworth 08:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks RHaworth for your help. I am just trying to get my name changed and then will re-write and re-submit fo review. I will also change the title to what you suggest. And I will have to learn about wikilinks - i don't know how to do it yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AWS10 (talk • contribs) 18:04, 21 March 2011

New username request
Seeing as I'm not seeing any responses that show you're actually listening, Here are a few key questions:
 * Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
 * Do you understand conflict of interest?
 * Do you understand that to be considered for an encylopedia article, the subject must be considered to be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 11:08, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I will respond to some of your points on AWS's behalf.
 * I believe he has stated (below) that he understands that. ("I do not want to advertise anything related to a business - I simply want the info available to people.")
 * I believe he has sufficiently proven notability from the references contained in the article. Also, some through google searching proves that this indeeed is a notable topic.
 * – Ajltalk 23:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Help
Hi there. I do understand the above and want to comply. I am very new to wikipedia relatively and new to all the codes and language. I thought I was doing the right thing? I am very down trodden by this whole experience! I explained why the article was noteable/worthy and they accepted on the proviso that I change my name and re-write substantially.

I thought they wanted me to change my name? I am so confused. I do not want to advertise anything related to a business - I simply want the info available to people.

When you say "no responses to show that I have been listening" I am not sure what I was suppose to respond too? I asked the administrator that deleted my page for help for my new draft. I have agreed to re-write. I have explained why the article is noteable. WHat else was i suppose to respond to? I am sure you have to deal with ijits like me all the time and that why you are being "stern" but I mean well.

I would love the opportunity to rewrite the article. I thought I was putting up a draft for people to check - I went through the draft wizard - I didn't know it was going to be put up on the public domain! I am so sorry. The article is well referenced - And I have put in more references since and made much shorter.

I am not even sure I am suppose to write my response here - should it be somewhere else? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AWS10 (talk • contribs) 18:03, 21 March 2011


 * Actually, yes, this is where your responses should be. The problem with them is that they haven't really addressed the COI issues. We could let you change your name, yes, but you still have the organizational connection. We'd like to know if you're interested in editing anything else other than the articles about things AWS does. Daniel Case (talk) 16:38, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Maybe one day but I have no immediate plans to write anything else. I can if it will mean I am allowed to change my name. The organisational connection is only through my email. Most of the work done on my topic is completed by Universities and government funded programs. If it is too hard, maybe I can take my content elsewhere. I do not want to create a conflict of interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AWS10 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 22 March 2011


 * AWS10, please don't forget to sign your comments using . Thank you. – Ajltalk 23:11, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. I am learning everyday! AWS10 (talk) 02:05, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Unblock accepted to change username
An admin has reviewed your request to be unblocked in order to request a change of username, and has approved the request. Please follow the directions listed here to request your name change. Cheers! – Ajltalk 05:59, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Request for draft review
I have created a draft of Sustainable Wildlife Enterprises for review - any comments or help will be appreciated : WP:Articles for creation/Sustainable Wildlife Enterprises JennyKS (talk) 00:23, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Taking a look now. – Ajltalk 00:38, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * It seems you haven't created it yet. I'll be back in a while to check on it again. – Ajltalk 00:41, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah. looks like you created it in the talk space instead. I moved it to the project space for you. I'll make comments there. – Ajltalk 00:44, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Whoops! Thanks. JennyKS (talk) 03:18, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Sustainable Wildlife Enterprises, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant   talk    20:58, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
 * Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

MfD nomination of User:JennyKS/Sustainable Wildlife Enterprises - Kangaroo
User:JennyKS/Sustainable Wildlife Enterprises - Kangaroo, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:JennyKS/Sustainable Wildlife Enterprises - Kangaroo and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:JennyKS/Sustainable Wildlife Enterprises - Kangaroo during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
 * Since you've been editing the mainspace article, I think we don't need this around anymore. If you have no objections to it being deleted, place db-u1 on the userspace page. – Ajltalk 08:00, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I think this page is ok delete.JennyKS (talk) 23:58, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

RfC:Infobox Road proposal
WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.


 * Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 05:46, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Darwin meet-up and public workshops
Hi,

Two public workshops will be hosted at the Northern Territory Library which will be held on 22 June 2016, 5.15pm and 26 June 2016, 2pm. There is also a meetup which will be held at 6pm on 25 June 2016. Bidgee (talk) 12:57, 20 June 2016 (UTC)