User talk:Jennymanda

A tag has been placed on Radiospares, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jeepday 14:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Your reverting of Ebay.
I deleted "Auction sniping is the process of watching a timed online auction, and placing a winning bid at the last possible moment (often literally seconds before the end of the auction), giving the other bidders no time to outbid the sniper. Some bidders do this manually, and others use online services designed for the purpose. While disliked by many eBay users, sniping is not against eBay rules, and is, in many cases, in the best interest of the bidder. eBay is a showcase for infantile spelling and poor grammar. Apart from a few (generally car related) fori, eBay appears to attract the very worst in language skills."

from the page, yet you placed them back with no discussion on the ebay talk section. The sniping section has absolutely no sources explaining why it belongs in the "Controversy and criticisms" section of the ebay page. If there was a section that explained "bidding tactics" then the sniping section would belong there. It does not belong in the controversy section without the appropriate references (otherwise it would qualify as violating NOR.

The second part is unencyclopedic and does not belong in the article. If you would like to discuss this further, please join the discussion on the ebay talk page. DanielZimmerman 15:04, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Embedded development platform
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Embedded development platform, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.electropages.com/printerFriendly.aspx?intArticle=10939. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:26, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Embedded development platform
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Embedded development platform, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RayAYang (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC)