User talk:Jennyytran

Welcome!
Hello, Jennyytran, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Cheryl Overs, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Alles Klar, Herr Kommisar  00:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Cheryl Overs


The article Cheryl Overs has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Alles Klar, Herr Kommisar  00:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cheryl Overs


The article Cheryl Overs has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dog six (talk) 01:25, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cheryl Overs


A tag has been placed on Cheryl Overs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. red dog six (talk) 01:30, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Cheryl Overs, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Alles Klar, Herr Kommisar  01:40, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=555449889 your edit] to Cheryl Overs may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=555450570 your edit] to Cheryl Overs may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=555471765 your edit] to Cheryl Overs may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. {| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 1px solid silver; margin-top: 0.2em;" |- ! style="background-color: #FAA;" | List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page {{!}}}Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:09, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white; " |
 * workers and policy makers(1996) name="Cheryl Overs" group="Network of Sex Work Projects" {{cite book|last=Overs|first=Cheryl|title=Making Sex Work Safe: A handbook for programme managers,
 * workers and policy makers(1996) name="Cheryl Overs" group="Network of Sex Work Projects" {{cite book|last=Overs|first=Cheryl|title=Making Sex Work Safe: A handbook for programme managers,

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=555474043 your edit] to Cheryl Overs may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. {{{!}} class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 1px solid silver; margin-top: 0.2em;" {{!}}- ! style="background-color: #FAA;" {{!}} List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page {{!}}- {{!}} style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white; " {{!}} {{!}}}Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:41, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * World Social Forums and the International Aids conferences. group="The Washington Times" {{red|&#62;}} {{cite news|last=Wetzstein|first=Cheryl|title=AIDS used as reason to legalize prostitutes|url=http:/
 * such as India, UK, South Africa, Bangladesh and Brazil group="Oxford University Press" {{red|&#62;}} {{cite journal|last=Overs|first=Cheryl|coauthors=Kerrigan D, Telles P, Torres H, Castle C|title=
 * workers and policy makers(1996) name="Cheryl Overs" group="Network of Sex Work Projects" {{red|&#62;}} {{cite book|last=Overs|first=Cheryl|title=Making Sex Work Safe: A handbook for programme managers,

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=555474339 your edit] to Cheryl Overs may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just [{{fullurl:Cheryl Overs|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20{{subst :REVISIONUSER}}&section=new my operator's talk page]. {{{!}} class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 1px solid silver; margin-top: 0.2em;" {{!}}- ! style="background-color: #FAA;" {{!}} List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page {{!}}- {{!}} style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white; " {{!}} {{!}}}Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:46, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * World Social Forums and the International Aids conferences. group="The Washington Times" {{red|&#62;}} {{cite news|last=Wetzstein|first=Cheryl|title=AIDS used as reason to legalize prostitutes|url=http:/
 * such as India, UK, South Africa, Bangladesh and Brazil group="Oxford University Press" {{red|&#62;}} {{cite journal|last=Overs|first=Cheryl|coauthors=Kerrigan D, Telles P, Torres H, Castle C|title=
 * workers and policy makers(1996) name="Cheryl Overs" group="Network of Sex Work Projects" {{red|&#62;}} {{cite book|last=Overs|first=Cheryl|title=Making Sex Work Safe: A handbook for programme managers,

Proposed deletion of Cheryl Overs


The article Cheryl Overs has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance.  Fails WP:BIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dog six (talk) 14:39, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Jennyytran. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Cheryl Overs, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:20, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Cheryl Overs. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:04, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Nomination of Cheryl Overs for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cheryl Overs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cheryl Overs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red dog six (talk) 21:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cheryl Overs, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. red dog six (talk) 21:56, 23 May 2013 (UTC)